Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais - CEFET - Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil.
Codas. 2024 May 31;36(4):e20230276. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023276pt. eCollection 2024.
To validate the content of the Speech-Language Pathology Concordance Test called FonoTCS.
This is a content validation study of the instrument. Five speech-language pathologists, all with doctoral degrees and teaching experience, averaging 24.8 years of professional practice, participated in the development of FonoTCS and reached a consensus during the process. Thirty questions and 120 items were created, covering seven areas of speech-language pathology expertise across three domains. For content validation, FonoTCS was electronically sent to 15 evaluators to respond to a questionnaire with five questions, rated on a five-point scale, regarding the criteria of clarity, ethics, and relevance of the questions. The Corrected Content Validity Coefficient was calculated for all statements to analyze the responses. Questions with agreement percentages equal to or less than 80% were revised.
Thirteen evaluators, all female, with an average age of 39.07 years, including eight with master's degrees and five with doctoral degrees, and an average clinical practice experience of 15.38 years, participated in the analysis. The average Corrected Content Validity Coefficient values for the clarity criterion were 0.93 and 0.95, for the relevance criterion 0.98 and 0.92, and for the ethics criterion 0.99. Two questions received scores of 0.78 and 0.80, both related to the audiology area in the assessment/diagnosis domain, specifically question 2 regarding the relevance criterion. These questions were reviewed and restructured by the judges.
FonoTCS is a valid instrument from a content perspective.
验证名为 FonoTCS 的言语病理学一致性测试的内容。
这是一项仪器的内容验证研究。五名言语治疗师均具有博士学位和教学经验，平均专业实践经验为 24.8 年，参与了 FonoTCS 的开发，并在过程中达成了共识。创建了 30 个问题和 120 个项目，涵盖言语病理学专业知识的七个领域，跨越三个领域。为了进行内容验证，将 FonoTCS 以电子方式发送给 15 名评估者，让他们回答一份包含五个问题的问卷，每个问题的评分标准为 5 分，涉及问题的清晰度、道德和相关性标准。计算了所有陈述的校正内容有效性系数，以分析反应。同意百分比等于或低于 80%的问题进行了修订。
共有 13 名评估者参与了分析，均为女性，平均年龄为 39.07 岁，其中 8 人具有硕士学位，5 人具有博士学位，平均临床实践经验为 15.38 年。清晰度标准的平均校正内容有效性系数为 0.93 和 0.95，相关性标准为 0.98 和 0.92，道德标准为 0.99。有两个问题的评分分别为 0.78 和 0.80，均与评估/诊断领域的听力学领域有关，具体是关于相关性标准的第 2 个问题。这些问题由评审重新进行了审查和重组。
从内容角度来看，FonoTCS 是一个有效的工具。
