Dehlin O, Hedenrud B, Jansson P, Nörgård J
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Feb;71(2):190-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb01270.x.
A double-blind parallel comparison of alaproclate and placebo was carried out in patients suffering from senile dementia of primary degenerative type, or multiinfarction dementia. Both groups consisted of 20 patients each, valid for efficacy evaluation. The patients received either alaproclate 200 mg twice daily or placebo according to a randomized procedure. The study started with a placebo washout period of 2 weeks followed by a 4-week period of active treatment or placebo and a finishing 2-week placebo washout period. The efficacy was evaluated with a dementia rating scale by Gottfries, Bråne and Steen (GBS), selected items from the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS), a rating scale for dementia adapted for nurses, and by clinical global evaluations. No difference in efficacy between the two treatments was observed with the exception of the intellectual factor of the GBS scale, where a statistically significant improvement was detected in the alaproclate group compared with the placebo group. There were no serious adverse symptoms.
对原发性退行性类型的老年痴呆症或多发性梗死性痴呆患者进行了阿扑氯铵与安慰剂的双盲平行对照试验。两组各有20名患者,可进行疗效评估。患者根据随机程序,每日两次服用200毫克阿扑氯铵或安慰剂。研究开始时有2周的安慰剂洗脱期,随后是4周的积极治疗或安慰剂治疗期,最后是2周的安慰剂洗脱期。采用Gottfries、Bråne和Steen(GBS)痴呆评定量表、综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)中的选定项目、一种适用于护士的痴呆评定量表以及临床整体评估来评估疗效。除了GBS量表的智力因素外,未观察到两种治疗在疗效上有差异,在该因素上,与安慰剂组相比,阿扑氯铵组有统计学上的显著改善。没有严重的不良症状。