• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难以接触?研究弱势、有帮派背景的年轻人所面临的方法学挑战。

Hard to reach? Methodological challenges researching vulnerable, gang-involved, young people.

机构信息

Public Health Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

School for Public Health Environments Research, Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14092. doi: 10.1111/hex.14092.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14092
PMID:38837299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11148633/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research with young people (YP) is ethically challenging and bound in a complex maze of issues relating to power, voice and representation. Such sensitivities mean that the challenges raised in researching marginalised YP are often hard to navigate. This paper reports on research carried out with YP to explore links between mental health, school exclusion and involvement in criminal gangs. It aims to provide a practical guide to negotiating some of the methodological and ethical challenges experienced.

METHOD

In-depth interviews conducted with 28 YP (aged 14-24 years) who were gang involved or seen to be at risk of gang involvement. Research was conducted in youth clubs, alternative provision and youth justice settings.

RESULTS

OBSERVATIONS/REFLECTIONS: We reflect on how navigating ethics can create barriers to involving YP as primary informants in research. We consider why it is important to overcome these hurdles and how public engagement work with recognised gatekeepers and the use of creative interview methods can facilitate meaningful encounters, where YP feel able to share valuable insights into their lives.

CONCLUSION

Alongside a number of specific learning points, the paper reflects on theories behind research with YP, including the need for recognition of power imbalances and reflexivity. It concludes with thoughts on the practical realities of achieving meaningful participation or an 'authentic voice' with marginalised groups and the importance of this in informing policy and practice.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The focus of this work was to collect experiences of YP who are recognised as gang-involved or at risk of being so, with a view to informing health and education policies. The scoping study for the project involved extensive public engagement work with YP exploring and trialling suitable methods of accessing, recruiting and ultimately interviewing this target group. This is central to the discussion within the body of the paper.

摘要

简介

对年轻人(YP)的研究具有伦理挑战性,并且涉及到与权力、声音和代表性相关的复杂问题。这种敏感性意味着,研究边缘化的 YP 所带来的挑战往往难以应对。本文报告了一项针对 YP 的研究,该研究旨在探讨心理健康、学校排斥和参与犯罪团伙之间的联系。本文旨在为解决研究中遇到的一些方法和伦理挑战提供实用指南。

方法

对 28 名 YP(年龄在 14-24 岁之间)进行了深入访谈,这些 YP 曾参与过帮派活动或被认为有参与帮派活动的风险。研究在青年俱乐部、替代教育和青年司法机构中进行。

结果

观察/反思:我们反思了如何在伦理导航中为 YP 作为主要信息来源参与研究设置障碍。我们考虑为什么克服这些障碍很重要,以及如何通过与公认的把关人进行公众参与工作和使用创造性的访谈方法,促进有意义的互动,使 YP 能够分享他们生活中的宝贵见解。

结论

除了一些具体的学习点外,本文还反思了与 YP 合作研究的理论基础,包括认识到权力失衡和反思性的必要性。最后,本文还思考了在边缘化群体中实现有意义的参与或“真实声音”的实际情况,以及这对于为政策和实践提供信息的重要性。

患者或公众贡献

这项工作的重点是收集被认为是帮派成员或有成为帮派成员风险的 YP 的经验,旨在为健康和教育政策提供信息。该项目的范围研究涉及与 YP 进行广泛的公众参与工作,探索和试验适合接触、招募并最终访谈这一目标群体的方法。这是本文讨论的核心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea70/11148633/e3d5e37aa745/HEX-27-e14092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea70/11148633/e3d5e37aa745/HEX-27-e14092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea70/11148633/e3d5e37aa745/HEX-27-e14092-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Hard to reach? Methodological challenges researching vulnerable, gang-involved, young people.难以接触?研究弱势、有帮派背景的年轻人所面临的方法学挑战。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14092. doi: 10.1111/hex.14092.
2
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家与青少年帮派成员身份相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):1-128. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.11. eCollection 2018.
4
Opportunities provision for preventing youth gang involvement for children and young people (7-16).为7至16岁儿童及青少年提供预防卷入青少年帮派的机会。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD007002. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007002.pub2.
5
Exploring young people's perspectives on mental health support: A qualitative study across three geographical areas in England, UK.探索英国英格兰三个地区年轻人对心理健康支持的看法:一项定性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6366-e6375. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14078. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
6
Emotional wellbeing and mental health: an exploration into health promotion in young people and families.情绪健康与心理健康:对年轻人及家庭健康促进的探索
Perspect Public Health. 2015 Jan;135(1):27-36. doi: 10.1177/1757913914558080.
7
Convention Versus Deviance: Moral Agency in Adolescent Gang Members' Decision Making.传统与越轨:青少年帮派成员决策中的道德能动性
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Apr 16;52(5):562-573. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1245339. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
8
Adolescent Gangs: Substance Misuse and Exposure to Adverse Childhood Experiences.青少年帮派:药物滥用与不良童年经历的暴露。
Psychiatry. 2021 Spring;84(1):33-45. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2020.1800291. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
9
"It Changed My Life": Traumatic Loss, Behavioral Health, and Turning Points Among Gang-Involved and Justice-Involved Youth.《改变人生的经历》:有帮派和司法涉案经历的青年的创伤性丧失、行为健康和转折点
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8027-8049. doi: 10.1177/0886260519847779. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
The impact of COVID-19 on young people's mental health, wellbeing and routine from a European perspective: A co-produced qualitative systematic review.从欧洲视角出发:COVID-19 对年轻人心理健康、福利和日常生活的影响:一项联合制作的定性系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0299547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299547. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating the voice of young people in mental health research: reflections from three lived experience advisory panels in Latin America.让年轻人的声音融入心理健康研究:来自拉丁美洲三个有实际经历咨询小组的思考。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 17;11(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00703-5.
2
Youth patient and public involvement in health research in the Netherlands: experiences from a multi-stakeholder interview study.荷兰青年患者及公众参与健康研究:一项多利益相关方访谈研究的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 29;11(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00700-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Approaches to consent in public health research in secondary schools.中学公共卫生研究中的同意方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 13;13(6):e070277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070277.
2
A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research.一项探索让年轻人参与精神健康研究益处的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1491-1504. doi: 10.1111/hex.13722. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
A scoping review: The utility of participatory research approaches in psychology.参与式研究方法在心理学中的应用:范围综述
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1865-1892. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22231. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
4
Researcher-researched relationship in qualitative research: Shifts in positions and researcher vulnerability.定性研究中的研究者与被研究者关系:立场转变与研究者的易受伤害性
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Jun 14;11:30996. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30996. eCollection 2016.
5
EARLY LIFE RISKS, ANTISOCIAL TENDENCIES, AND PRETEEN DELINQUENCY.早期生活风险、反社会倾向与青春期前犯罪
Criminology. 2015 Nov;53(4):677-701. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12093. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
6
Adolescents' reactions to participating in ethically sensitive research: a prospective self-report study.青少年对参与具有伦理敏感性研究的反应:一项前瞻性自我报告研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2015 Aug 21;9:39. doi: 10.1186/s13034-015-0074-3. eCollection 2015.
7
Please Tell! Barriers to Disclosing Sexual Victimization and Subsequent Social Support Perceived by Children and Adolescents.请告知!儿童和青少年所感知到的性侵害披露障碍及后续社会支持情况
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Jan;31(2):355-77. doi: 10.1177/0886260514555371. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Informed consent, vulnerability and the risks of group-specific attribution.知情同意、脆弱性与群体特定归因的风险。
Nurs Ethics. 2014 Nov;21(7):829-43. doi: 10.1177/0969733013518448. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
9
Protecting vulnerable research participants: a Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees.保护脆弱的研究参与者:基于福柯思想的伦理委员会分析。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Sep;18(5):640-50. doi: 10.1177/0969733011403807. Epub 2011 Jun 6.