Wild Animal Initiative, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Bioessays. 2024 Aug;46(8):e2300205. doi: 10.1002/bies.202300205. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
Because of their ubiquity, plasticity, and direct effects on the nervous system, markers of oxidative status may be of great value to assess animal welfare across species and conditions in the wild. However, welfare biologists have not yet seized this opportunity, possibly because the validity of these markers as welfare indicators remains questionable. A validation process was, therefore, performed here using a meta-analytical approach considering three conditions assumed to impair the welfare of animals. With very few exceptions, two of the four considered markers consistently varied across these negatively-valenced conditions. By highlighting the current underrepresentation of markers of oxidative status in animal welfare studies, and by concretely illustrating that some of these markers can consistently reflect negative affective states, this article aims to encourage biologists to include these physiological markers in their toolbox to better measure, monitor, and perhaps also improve the welfare of animals in their natural habitat.
由于其普遍性、可塑性以及对神经系统的直接影响,氧化状态标志物对于评估不同物种和野外条件下的动物福利可能具有重要价值。然而,福利生物学家尚未抓住这一机会,这可能是因为这些标志物作为福利指标的有效性仍然存在疑问。因此,在这里使用元分析方法进行了验证过程,考虑了三种被认为会损害动物福利的条件。除了极少数例外,在所考虑的四个标志物中有两个在这些负面评价条件下始终发生变化。通过突出氧化状态标志物在动物福利研究中的当前代表性不足,并具体说明其中一些标志物可以始终如一地反映出消极的情感状态,本文旨在鼓励生物学家将这些生理标志物纳入他们的工具包中,以更好地测量、监测,也许还可以改善动物在其自然栖息地中的福利。