Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Nov;20(6):2231-2244. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4963. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
Commercialization of rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries has revolutionized the design of portable electronic devices and is facilitating the current transition to electric vehicles. The technological specifications of Li-ion batteries continue to evolve through the introduction of various high-risk liquid electrolyte chemicals, yet critical evaluation of the physical, environmental, and human health hazards of these substances is lacking. Using the GreenScreen for Safer Chemicals approach, we conducted a chemical hazard assessment (CHA) of 103 electrolyte chemicals categorized into seven chemical groups: salts, carbonates, esters, ethers, sulfoxides-sulfites-sulfones, overcharge protection additives, and flame-retardant additives. To minimize data gaps, we focused on six toxicity and hazard data sources, including three empirical and three nonempirical predictive data sources. Furthermore, we investigated the structural similarities among selected electrolyte chemicals using the ChemMine tool and the simplified molecular input line entry system inputs from PubChem to evaluate whether chemicals with similar structures exhibit similar toxicity. The results demonstrate that salts, overcharge protection additives, and flame-retardant additives contain the most toxic components in the electrolyte solutions. Furthermore, carbonates, esters, and ethers account for most flammability hazards in Li-ion batteries. This study supports the complementary use of quantitative structure-activity relationship models to minimize data gaps and inconsistencies in CHA. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:2231-2244. © 2024 The Author(s). Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
商业化的可充电锂离子(Li-ion)电池彻底改变了便携式电子设备的设计,并且正在推动当前向电动汽车的转型。通过引入各种高风险的液体电解质化学品,Li-ion 电池的技术规格不断发展,但对这些物质的物理、环境和人类健康危害的关键评估却缺乏。我们使用更安全化学品的 GreenScreen 方法,对 103 种电解质化学品进行了化学危害评估(CHA),这些化学品分为七个化学组:盐、碳酸盐、酯类、醚类、亚砜-亚硫酸-砜类、过充电保护添加剂和阻燃添加剂。为了最小化数据差距,我们专注于六个毒性和危害数据来源,包括三个经验数据来源和三个非经验数据来源。此外,我们使用 ChemMine 工具和 PubChem 的简化分子输入行输入来研究选定电解质化学品之间的结构相似性,以评估具有相似结构的化学品是否表现出相似的毒性。结果表明,盐、过充电保护添加剂和阻燃添加剂在电解质溶液中含有最有毒的成分。此外,碳酸盐、酯类和醚类在 Li-ion 电池中占大多数可燃性危害。本研究支持定量构效关系模型的互补使用,以最小化 CHA 中的数据差距和不一致性。综合环境评估与管理 2024;20:2231-2244. © 2024 作者。环境毒理化学学会(SETAC)旗下 Wiley 期刊出版公司出版的综合环境评估与管理刊登。