Grob G N
Am J Public Health. 1985 Mar;75(3):229-36. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.3.229.
Psychiatric epidemiology developed relatively late (as compared with epidemiology generally). Nineteenth century psychiatrists, although avid collectors of statistics, did not use such data in any systematic manner. The impetus for the creation of an epidemiology of mental illness came from the work of late nineteenth century social scientists concerned with understanding individual and social behavior and applying their findings to social problems. Initially they helped to create the modern census, which represented a radical faith that quantitative research, when merged with administrative rationality, could replace politics. During and after the 1920s, the demographic analysis of the institutionalized mentally ill population expanded sharply; by the late 1930s and 1940s psychiatric epidemiologists had begun to study the role of socioenvironmental variables and the incidence of mental illness in the community. Twentieth century psychiatric epidemiologists, however, faced a severe intellectual problem; their work rested on a descriptive rather than an etiological nosology. Consequently, the results of epidemiological studies in psychiatry often differed precisely because of variations in the design of studies and classification systems as well as the subjective observations of the investigators themselves. The ensuing disagreements among those involved in the epidemiologic study of mental illness were a natural consequence.
与一般流行病学相比,精神疾病流行病学的发展相对较晚。19世纪的精神病学家虽然热衷于收集统计数据,但并未以任何系统的方式使用这些数据。创建精神疾病流行病学的动力来自19世纪后期社会科学家的工作,他们关注理解个体和社会行为,并将其研究结果应用于社会问题。最初,他们帮助创建了现代人口普查,这体现了一种激进的信念,即定量研究与行政合理性相结合时,可以取代政治。在20世纪20年代及之后,对住院精神病患者群体的人口统计学分析急剧扩展;到20世纪30年代末和40年代,精神疾病流行病学家开始研究社会环境变量的作用以及社区中精神疾病的发病率。然而,20世纪的精神疾病流行病学家面临一个严重的学术问题;他们的工作基于描述性而非病因学分类法。因此,精神病学流行病学研究的结果常常因研究设计、分类系统的差异以及研究者自身的主观观察而有所不同。精神疾病流行病学研究相关人员之间随之产生的分歧是自然的结果。