• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 ECIRS 和 MPCNL 治疗复杂性肾结石:一项回顾性单中心的疗效和安全性研究。

Comparing ECIRS with MPCNL for Complex Renal Calculi: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study on Efficacy and Safety.

机构信息

Urology Surgery, Kashi Prefecture Second People's Hospital, 844000 Kashgar, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2024 May;77(4):418-425. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247704.57.

DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247704.57
PMID:38840286
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Kidney stones, a common urinary system ailment, often necessitate surgical intervention. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) and multi-channel percutaneous nephron lithotripsy (MPCNL) are key modalities for treating complex renal stones, prompting the need for a comparative analysis to enhance clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgical treatment for complex kidney stones from April 2018 to April 2022 were divided into the control (MPCNL) and observation (ECIRS) groups. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline data, and -tests and chi-square tests were employed to compare the perioperative indicators between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were enrolled in this study for pre-observational comparison, and they were divided into the control group (110 patients) and observation group (100 patients). Following matching, each group comprised 85 patients. Pre-observational comparison revealed significant differences between the groups in age, disease duration, and stone diameter ( < 0.05). However, after matching, baseline data comparison showed no statistically significant differences ( > 0.05). Surgery-related parameters, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative activity duration and hospital stay, did not significantly differ between the groups ( > 0.05). The observation group exhibited a significantly higher stone retention-free rate after initial treatment compared with the control group ( < 0.05), although overall stone clearance rates did not significantly differ between the groups ( > 0.05). We found no significant differences in perioperative complications between the two groups ( > 0.05). Moreover, the observation group experienced significantly lower postoperative pain levels at 6, 24 and 48 h compared with the control group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conclusively, ECIRS and MPCNL are viable options for treating complex renal calculi, with similar operation times, complication rates and stone clearance rates. ECIRS may offer advantages including lower postoperative pain and higher initial stone clearance rates than MPCNL. However, large-scale studies with long follow-up times are needed for validation.

摘要

背景

肾结石是一种常见的泌尿系统疾病,常需手术干预。经皮肾镜碎石取石术(MPCNL)和内镜下联合肾内手术(ECIRS)是治疗复杂性肾结石的主要方法,需要进行对比分析以辅助临床决策。

方法

选择 2018 年 4 月至 2022 年 4 月收治的行手术治疗的复杂性肾结石患者,分为对照组(MPCNL)和观察组(ECIRS)。采用倾向性评分匹配法均衡基线资料,采用 t 检验和卡方检验比较两组围手术期指标。

结果

本研究共纳入 210 例患者进行预观察性比较,分为对照组(110 例)和观察组(100 例)。匹配后,每组各 85 例。预观察性比较显示,两组在年龄、病程和结石直径方面存在显著差异(<0.05)。但匹配后,基线资料比较无统计学差异(>0.05)。手术相关参数,包括手术时间、术中出血量、术后活动时间和住院时间,两组间差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。观察组初始治疗后结石无残留率显著高于对照组(<0.05),但两组结石总清除率无显著差异(>0.05)。两组围手术期并发症发生率无显著差异(>0.05)。观察组术后 6、24、48 h 时的疼痛评分显著低于对照组(<0.001)。

结论

ECIRS 和 MPCNL 均可用于治疗复杂性肾结石,两者手术时间、并发症发生率和结石清除率相似。ECIRS 可能具有术后疼痛轻、初始结石清除率高的优势,但仍需大样本、长期随访的研究加以验证。

相似文献

1
Comparing ECIRS with MPCNL for Complex Renal Calculi: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study on Efficacy and Safety.比较 ECIRS 和 MPCNL 治疗复杂性肾结石:一项回顾性单中心的疗效和安全性研究。
Arch Esp Urol. 2024 May;77(4):418-425. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247704.57.
2
Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: A randomised controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜下内镜联合肾内手术治疗部分鹿角形结石的随机对照试验
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus percutaneuos nephrolithotomy for complex pediatric stone disease: A comparative analysis of efficacy and safety.内镜下联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗复杂小儿肾结石病:疗效和安全性的对比分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Aug;20(4):606.e1-606.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Comparison of mini endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery and multitract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy specifically for kidney staghorn stones: a single-centre experience.微通道经皮肾镜碎石术与多通道微创经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形肾结石的比较:单中心经验。
BMC Urol. 2022 Jun 30;22(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01030-7.
5
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large and Complex Renal Stone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下联合肾脏内手术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗大体积复杂肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2022 Jul;36(7):865-876. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0761. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
6
Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2-3 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study.比较女性 2-3cm 肾结石采用输尿管软镜与微通道经皮肾镜取石术的疗效和安全性:一项单中心研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Nov;27(22):11115-11121. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202311_34481.
7
The First 100 Cases of Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in Korea: Matched Cohort Analyses versus Shock-Wave Lithotripsy.韩国经皮肾镜联合内镜手术的前 100 例:匹配队列分析与体外冲击波碎石术的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 May;63(5):440-445. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.5.440.
8
Impacts of urinary tract anomalies or history of upper urinary tract surgery on outcome of mini-ECIRS (endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery).尿路异常或上尿路手术史对迷你经皮肾镜取石术(内镜下肾内联合手术)结局的影响。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 9;52(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01638-4.
9
Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones.回顾性研究单次使用数字软性输尿管镜碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗 1.5-2.5cm 下极肾结石的效果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03771-2. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery for Simultaneous Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Retrospective Study.内镜联合肾内手术治疗同时性肾输尿管结石:一项回顾性研究
J Endourol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1056-1061. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0329. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Combined Intra Renal Surgery versus Percutanous Nephrolithotomy: utcomes of a matched case-control analyis.内镜联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术:配对病例对照分析的结果
World J Urol. 2025 May 6;43(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05455-1.