Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China.
Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03771-2. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical information of patients with 1.5-2.5 cm lower pole renal stones treated by single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURS) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in affiliated hospital of the Nantong University from January 2020 to December 2022. To compare the safety and efficacy of single-use fURS and MPCNL in the treatment from 1.5cm to 2.5cm lower pole renal stones.
Clinical information of 141 patients were collected and divided into single-use fURS group and MPCNL group according to their treatment methods, including 83 patients in the single-use fURS group and 58 patients in the MPCNL group. Baseline data, data on the clinical characteristics of stones, laboratory examination data, operation time, and postoperative data of the two groups were collected. Statistical analysis was made on the collected data to analyze the differences and causes between the two groups of patients.
There was no significant difference in the baseline data and preoperative clinical features of 141 patients between the two groups (P > 0.05). In comparison of postoperative serum indexes, the drop values of hemoglobin and creatinine in single-use fURS group were lower than those in MPCNL group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The stone free rate was higher in the MPCNL group than in the single-use fURS group on the first day after surgery. At the 1st month after surgery, the two groups were similar. At 3rd month after surgery, the single-use fURS group was slightly higher than the MPCNL group, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The total complication rate in single-use fURS group was slightly lower than that in MPCNL group, but there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05).
Single-use fURS has similar safety and efficacy to MPCNL in the treatment of 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones. Single-use fURS may be a new option for the treatment of these stones.
回顾性分析南通大学附属医院 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月采用一次性使用电子输尿管软镜碎石术(fURS)和微通道经皮肾镜碎石术(MPCNL)治疗 1.5-2.5cm 下盏肾结石患者的临床资料,比较 1.5-2.5cm 下盏肾结石采用一次性 fURS 与 MPCNL 治疗的安全性和有效性。
收集 141 例患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法分为一次性 fURS 组和 MPCNL 组,其中一次性 fURS 组 83 例,MPCNL 组 58 例。收集两组患者的一般资料、结石临床特征资料、实验室检查资料、手术时间及术后资料,对收集的数据进行统计学分析,分析两组患者之间的差异及原因。
两组 141 例患者的一般资料及术前临床特征比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后血清指标比较,一次性 fURS 组血红蛋白、肌酐下降值低于 MPCNL 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后第 1 天结石清除率 MPCNL 组高于一次性 fURS 组,术后 1 个月两组比较差异无统计学意义,术后 3 个月一次性 fURS 组略高于 MPCNL 组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。一次性 fURS 组总并发症发生率略低于 MPCNL 组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
一次性 fURS 治疗 1.5-2.5cm 下盏肾结石的安全性及有效性与 MPCNL 相似,一次性 fURS 可能是治疗此类结石的新选择。