• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

"Sensemaking" to Aid Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice: A Personal Response to Information Overload and Decision Abdication.

作者信息

Vickers Andrew J, Bennett Paul

机构信息

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, New York, NY, USA.

NHS Westlands Medical Centre, Hampshire, UK.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2024 Aug;44(6):607-610. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241257941. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X241257941
PMID:38840535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11347086/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
"Sensemaking" to Aid Shared Decision Making in Clinical Practice: A Personal Response to Information Overload and Decision Abdication.助力临床实践中共同决策的“意义建构”：对信息过载与决策放弃的个人回应
Med Decis Making. 2024 Aug;44(6):607-610. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241257941. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Shared decision-making in mental and behavioural health interventions.心理和行为健康干预中的共享决策。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1210-1216. doi: 10.1111/jep.13255. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
3
[What place for shared decision making in internal medicine practice?].[共同决策在内科实践中的地位如何？]
Rev Med Interne. 2019 Jul;40(7):417-418. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Shared decision making in perioperative medicine.围手术期医学中的共同决策。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Apr 2;81(4):1-2. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2019.0295.
5
Patient Orientation and Shared Decision- Making-Implementing Patients' Rights in Routine Clinical Practice.患者导向与共同决策——在常规临床实践中落实患者权利
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jun 14;121(12):383-384. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0112.
6
Facilitating patient participation by embracing patients' preferences-A discussion.通过接受患者偏好促进患者参与——一场讨论
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1070-1073. doi: 10.1111/jep.13126. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
7
What is the best model of the physician-patient relationship?医患关系的最佳模式是什么？
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1111-1112. doi: 10.1111/jep.13156. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
8
Shared decision-making in maternity care: Acknowledging and overcoming epistemic defeaters.产妇护理中的共享决策：承认和克服认识上的反驳。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1113-1120. doi: 10.1111/jep.13243. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Quality of the screening process: An overlooked critical factor and an essential component of shared decision making about screening.筛查过程的质量：一个被忽视的关键因素以及筛查共同决策的重要组成部分。
Can Fam Physician. 2019 May;65(5):331-336.
10
Shared Medical Decision Making Reconsidered: Challenging an Overly Cognitivist Perspective with a Linguistic Approach.重新思考共享医疗决策：用语言方法挑战过于认知主义的观点。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2281-2291. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2065736. Epub 2022 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Current policies on early detection of prostate cancer create overdiagnosis and inequity with minimal benefit.当前前列腺癌早期检测政策造成了过度诊断和不公平现象，而获益却微乎其微。
BMJ. 2023 May 17;381:e071082. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071082.
2
Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making.应对基层医疗中缺乏时间进行详细共同决策的问题：日常共同决策
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3045-3049. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06043-2. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
3
Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.前列腺癌筛查：美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2018 May 8;319(18):1901-1913. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3710.
4
A simple schema for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.一个用于前列腺癌筛查知情决策的简单模式。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 16;161(6):441-2. doi: 10.7326/M14-0151.
5
The shared decision-making continuum.共同决策连续体。
JAMA. 2010 Aug 25;304(8):903-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1208.
6
Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).医疗问诊中的共同决策：这意味着什么？（或者说至少需要两人才能共舞）。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Mar;44(5):681-92. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3.