Suppr超能文献

前盂肱关节不稳中移植物的位置、愈合及吸收情况:4种关节盂增强技术的比较

Graft Position, Healing, and Resorption in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Comparison of 4 Glenoid Augmentation Techniques.

作者信息

Delgado Cristina, Calvo Emilio, Díaz Heredia Jorge, Cañete Pablo, García Navlet Miguel, Ruiz Ibán Miguel Angel

机构信息

Shoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.

Shoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):23259671241253163. doi: 10.1177/23259671241253163. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The success of glenoid augmentation procedures depends on accurate placement and healing of the graft to the glenoid. Different glenoid augmentation techniques have been described, but no comparative studies between them exist.

PURPOSE

To assess the bone graft position, healing, and resorption in a group of patients treated with 1 of 4 procedures: arthroscopic anterior bone-block procedure using either (1) fresh-frozen iliac crest allograft or (2) iliac crest autograft, (3) open Latarjet, or (4) arthroscopic Latarjet.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients (87.5% men; mean age, 29.5 ± 7.9 years) were included, with 10 patients in each of the procedure groups. The graft position in the axial and sagittal planes was assessed on postoperative computed tomography (CT). Graft healing and resorption were assessed in a second CT scan performed 1 year postoperatively. Qualitative variables were compared between the 4 procedures using the chi-square test, and quantitative variables were compared with the Student test or Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the procedures in the axial or sagittal position. The healing rate was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group (20%) compared with the autograft bone-block (80%), open Latarjet (90%), and arthroscopic Latarjet (90%) groups ( < .001). Graft resorption developed in 17 of 40 (42.5%) cases overall. Osteolysis occurred in 100% of cases in the allograft bone-block group compared with 50% in the autograft group, 20% in the open Latarjet group, and 0% in the arthroscopic Latarjet group ( < .001). The glenoid surface area on 1-year CT scan was significantly lower in the allograft bone-block group compared with the autograft bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet groups ( < .001).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic bone-block, open Latarjet, and arthroscopic Latarjet procedures provided accurate bone graft positioning. However, very high rates of osteolysis and nonunion were observed in the iliac crest fresh-frozen allograft bone-block procedure when compared with the other procedures.

摘要

背景

关节盂增强手术的成功取决于移植物在关节盂上的准确放置和愈合情况。已经描述了不同的关节盂增强技术,但它们之间尚无比较研究。

目的

评估一组接受以下4种手术之一治疗的患者的骨移植位置、愈合情况和吸收情况:(1)使用新鲜冷冻髂嵴同种异体骨或(2)髂嵴自体骨的关节镜下前路骨块手术、(3)开放性Latarjet手术或(4)关节镜下Latarjet手术。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

共纳入40例患者(男性占87.5%;平均年龄29.5±7.9岁),每个手术组10例患者。术后通过计算机断层扫描(CT)评估移植物在轴向和矢状面上的位置。在术后1年进行的第二次CT扫描中评估移植物的愈合和吸收情况。使用卡方检验比较4种手术之间的定性变量,使用学生t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验比较定量变量。

结果

在轴向或矢状位置上,各手术之间未发现差异。与自体骨块组(80%)、开放性Latarjet组(90%)和关节镜下Latarjet组(90%)相比,同种异体骨块组的愈合率显著较低(20%)(P<0.001)。40例患者中有17例(42.5%)总体出现移植物吸收。同种异体骨块组100%的病例发生骨溶解,而自体骨块组为50%,开放性Latarjet组为20%,关节镜下Latarjet组为0%(P<0.001)。与自体骨块组、开放性Latarjet组和关节镜下Latarjet组相比,同种异体骨块组术后1年CT扫描显示的关节盂表面积显著更小(P<0.001)。

结论

关节镜下骨块手术、开放性Latarjet手术和关节镜下Latarjet手术能实现准确的骨移植定位。然而,与其他手术相比,髂嵴新鲜冷冻同种异体骨块手术中观察到非常高的骨溶解和不愈合发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34d3/11151773/b3ecb2c9ae41/10.1177_23259671241253163-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验