Calvo Emilio, Delgado Cristina
Shoulder and Elbow Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma, Avda Reyes Católicos, 2, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Mar 21;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00588-x.
Bone loss has been identified as a risk factor for recurrent shoulder dislocations or failure after soft tissue repair. Although the range for "critical" bone loss is yet to be determined, glenoid and humeral bone defects should not be regarded as independent problems, but the interaction between them during shoulder motion should be evaluated as suggested by the glenoid track concept. The glenoid track concept is now widely accepted and considered essential for making decisions about surgery. Soft-tissue procedures usually work well in patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions but in off-track lesions do not. In this situation additional procedures should be performed.Different surgical options have been described to address off-track Hill-Sachs lesions, most commonly remplissage, Latarjet or free bone block procedures. Coracoid graft and free bone grafts convert the off-track Hill-Sachs lesion into on-track by lengthening the glenoid-track, whereas remplissage fill-in the humeral lesion so that it does not engage. In the setting of a Hill-Sachs lesion with little or no glenoid bone loss, remplissage has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes with a low complications and recurrence rate. Favorable results have been reported with glenoid bone grafting when managing isolated Hill-Sachs or bipolar lesions. Studies analyzing Latarjet and Eden-Hybinette procedures show that both procedures are safe and effective in the management of anterior glenohumeral instability. Attention should be paid to those patients with large bone defects not amenable to be restored with an isolated Latarjet that may be better addressed with an Eden-Hybinnete or adding a remplissage to the Latarjet procedure.
骨质流失已被确定为复发性肩关节脱位或软组织修复失败的一个风险因素。尽管“临界”骨质流失的范围尚未确定,但肩胛盂和肱骨骨缺损不应被视为独立的问题,而应如肩胛盂轨迹概念所建议的那样,评估它们在肩部运动过程中的相互作用。肩胛盂轨迹概念现已被广泛接受,并被认为是手术决策的关键。软组织手术通常对伴有轨迹内希尔-萨克斯损伤的患者效果良好,但对轨迹外损伤则不然。在这种情况下,应采取额外的手术。已经描述了不同的手术选择来处理轨迹外希尔-萨克斯损伤,最常见的是 remplissage 手术、Latarjet 手术或游离骨块手术。喙突移植和游离骨移植通过延长肩胛盂轨迹将轨迹外希尔-萨克斯损伤转变为轨迹内损伤,而 remplissage 手术则填充肱骨损伤部位,使其不会嵌合。在希尔-萨克斯损伤且肩胛盂骨质流失很少或没有骨质流失的情况下,remplissage 手术已显示出令人满意的结果,并发症和复发率较低。在处理孤立的希尔-萨克斯损伤或双极损伤时,肩胛盂植骨已报告有良好的结果。分析 Latarjet 手术和伊登-比内特手术的研究表明,这两种手术在治疗前盂肱关节不稳方面都是安全有效的。对于那些有大骨缺损且无法通过孤立的 Latarjet 手术修复的患者应予以关注,这些患者可能通过伊登-比内特手术或在 Latarjet 手术中增加 remplissage 手术能得到更好的治疗。