Hand Motion Analysis Using Accelerometer-Based Sensors and Sheep's Head Model for Basic Training in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

INTRODUCTION

Motion analysis, the study of movement patterns to evaluate performance, plays a crucial role in surgical training. It provides objective data that can be used to assess and improve trainee's precision, efficiency, and overall surgical technique. The primary aim of this study is to employ accelerometer-based sensors placed on the wrist to analyze hand motions during endoscopic sinus surgery training using the sheep's head. By capturing detailed movement data, the study seeks to quantify the motion characteristics that distinguish different levels of surgical expertise. This approach seeks to quantify motion characteristics indicative of surgical expertise and enhance the objectivity and effectiveness of surgical training feedback mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four participants were divided into three groups based on their experience with endoscopic endonasal surgery. Each participant was tasked with performing specified procedures on an individual sheep's head, concentrating on exploring both nasal passages. A single Bluetooth Accelerometer WitMotion sensor was mounted on the dorsal surface of each hand. This facilitates the evaluation of efficiency parameters such as time, path length, and acceleration during the training procedures. Accelerometer data were collected and imported in CSV format (comma-separated values) for each group of surgeons-senior, specialist, and resident-mean values and standard deviations were computed. The Shapiro-Wilk Test assessed the normality of the distribution. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to compare procedural time, acceleration, and path length differences across the three surgeon experience levels.

RESULTS

For the procedural time, statistical significance appears in all surgical steps (p<0.001), with the biggest difference in the septoplasty group in favor of the senior group. A clear difference can be observed between the resulting acceleration of the dominant hands (instrument hand) and the non-dominant hand (endoscopic hand) and between the study groups. The difference between groups reaches statistical significance with a p-value <0.001. A statistically significant difference can be seen between the paths covered by each hand of every participant (p<0.001). Also, senior doctors covered significantly less movement with both hands than the specialists and the resident doctors (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data show a clear learning curve from resident to senior, with residents taking more time and using more hand movements to complete the same tasks. Specialists are in the intermediate phase, showing signs of honing their technique towards efficiency. This comprehensive data set can help tailor training programs to focus on both efficiency (quicker procedures) and economy of motion (reduced path length and acceleration), especially in more complex procedures where the difference in performance is more pronounced.