Nilsson Artur
Department of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
J Pers Oriented Res. 2024 May 23;10(1):56-60. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2024.26271. eCollection 2024.
Although distinctions between the study of persons, the study of populations, and the study of mechanisms are helpful for illuminating mismatches between research assumptions, problems, and methods, it may be difficult to construe these as entirely discrete branches of psychological science. I suggest that it is more appropriate to view person-levelness (or person-sensitivity) as an ideal we should actively aspire toward, within the constraints placed by other goals such as generalizability and feasibility, when pursuing knowledge about individuals. It is an ideal that we can never hope to perfectly realize-the degree to which it is realized will always be a matter of degree, and there is therefore no clear line of demarcation between the person level and other branches of psychology. This ideal can nonetheless stimulate more person-sensitive conceptualizations, measurements, and analyses.
尽管对个体研究、群体研究和机制研究进行区分,有助于阐明研究假设、问题和方法之间的不匹配,但可能难以将这些视为心理学完全独立的分支。我认为,在追求关于个体的知识时,在诸如可推广性和可行性等其他目标所设定的限制范围内,将个体层面(或个体敏感性)视为我们应积极追求的理想更为合适。这是一个我们永远无法完美实现的理想——其实现程度总是有高低之分,因此个体层面与心理学的其他分支之间没有明确的界限。然而,这一理想仍能激发更具个体敏感性的概念化、测量和分析。