Centre for Global Health and Policy, Department of Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Centre for Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1181837. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1181837. eCollection 2024.
Childhood exposure to domestic violence and abuse (DVA) can lead to major short- and long-term effects on the victim. Despite this, there is no accepted measure for children's experiences, with most existing measures being validated only in high income countries and not in low- and middle- income countries. As a result, international statistics are not comparable. This paper seeks to critically appraise existing measures and discuss whether any are fit-for-purpose on a global scale.
The COSMIN PROMs approach was followed to critically appraise and compare the appropriateness of measures. A comprehensive literature search was undertaken in seven journal databases for measures mentioned in formally peer-reviewed articles exploring childhood exposure to DVA.
A literature search resulted in the identification of 10 measures and, following criteria to only keep original measures and remove modifications, four measures which have been validated cross-culturally are discussed in detail in line with the COSMIN PROMs criterion: The Child Exposure to Domestic Violence Scale, Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale, Juvenile Victimization Questionnaire and The Violence Exposure Scale for Children. Strengths and limitations of each are discussed, along with any validations undertaken not in the country of origin.
Despite childhood exposure to DVA being an urgent research priority worldwide, the current measures to explore the extent of the issue are not validated cross-culturally, leading to concerns about comparisons across different population groups. The development and implementation of interventions to reduce the levels and effects of exposure relies heavily on cross-cultural comparisons, which may indicate different strategies are needed in different contexts. The lack of these validated comparisons is constraining advances, and the paper advocates for further efforts to be made in this regard.
儿童期遭受家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)会对受害者造成重大的短期和长期影响。尽管如此,目前还没有被广泛接受的儿童经历评估方法,大多数现有的评估方法仅在高收入国家得到验证,而在中低收入国家则没有。因此,国际统计数据无法进行比较。本文旨在批判性地评估现有的评估方法,并讨论是否有任何方法在全球范围内适用。
采用 COSMIN PROMs 方法对评估方法进行批判性评估和比较,在七个期刊数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以查找在正式同行评议文章中探索儿童期遭受 DVA 的文章中提到的评估方法。
文献检索结果确定了 10 种评估方法,在仅保留原始评估方法和去除修改版本的标准下,根据 COSMIN PROMs 标准详细讨论了 4 种已在跨文化环境中验证的评估方法:儿童遭受家庭暴力量表、儿童对父母间冲突的感知量表、青少年受害问卷和儿童暴力暴露量表。讨论了每种方法的优缺点,以及在原产国之外进行的任何验证。
尽管全球范围内迫切需要研究儿童期遭受 DVA 的问题,但目前用于探索问题严重程度的评估方法尚未在跨文化环境中得到验证,这引起了对不同人群群体之间进行比较的担忧。减少暴露程度和影响的干预措施的开发和实施严重依赖于跨文化比较,这可能表明在不同背景下需要不同的策略。缺乏这些经过验证的比较限制了进展,本文主张在这方面进一步努力。