Department of Cardiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital.
2nd Department of Medicine - Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(4):319-323. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001172. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
Cardiogenic shock is a clinical syndrome with different causes and a complex pathophysiology. Recent evidence from clinical trials evokes the urgent need for redefining clinical diagnostic criteria to be compliant with the definition of cardiogenic shock and current diagnostic methods.
Conflicting results from randomized clinical trials investigating mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock have elicited several extremely important questions. At minimum, it is questionable whether survivors of cardiac arrest should be included in trials focused on cardiogenic shock. Moreover, considering the wide availability of ultrasound and hemodynamic monitors capable of arterial pressure analysis, the current clinical diagnostic criteria based on the presence of hypotension and hypoperfusion have become insufficient. As such, new clinical criteria for the diagnosis of cardiogenic shock should include evidence of low cardiac output and appropriate ventricular filling pressure.
Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be revised to better define cardiac pump failure as a primary cause of hemodynamic compromise.
心原性休克是一种具有不同病因和复杂病理生理学的临床综合征。来自临床试验的最新证据迫切需要重新定义临床诊断标准,使其与心原性休克的定义和当前的诊断方法相符合。
在心原性休克患者中使用机械循环支持的随机临床试验得出了相互矛盾的结果,引发了几个极其重要的问题。至少,是否应该将心脏骤停幸存者纳入专注于心原性休克的试验是值得怀疑的。此外,考虑到能够进行动脉压分析的超声和血流动力学监测仪的广泛可用性,目前基于低血压和低灌注存在的临床诊断标准已经不够充分。因此,心原性休克的新临床诊断标准应包括低心输出量和适当的心室充盈压的证据。
心原性休克的临床诊断标准应进行修订,以更好地将心脏泵衰竭定义为血流动力学障碍的主要原因。