University College London, London, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Dec;54(6):907-930. doi: 10.1177/03063127241257489. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
Sociotechnical imaginaries (SIs) have emerged as a popular and generative concept within Science and Technology Studies (STS). This article draws out the affective component of SIs, combining a review of relevant literatures with an empirical case study of an anti-fracking imaginary in Ireland to suggest how we might theorize an affective technopolitics of SIs. The literature review identifies three key aspects of SIs that would benefit from a more coherent conceptualization of affect: the utopian, productive, and collectivizing dimensions of imaginaries. Emotions such as desire and fear appear prominently in the SI literature, but in ways that require development. Using empirical examples from my research, I outline what this developed understanding of emotions in imaginaries might look like. I examine the role that emotions played in the development and settlement of an anti-fracking imaginary in Ireland, highlighting how the intensive, multimodal, and dynamic nature of affect underpinned the productive, collective, and utopian dimensions of the SI. I conclude with some remarks about how this developed theory of emotion positions STS researchers to address issues of humanity, representation, and the building of better worlds.
社会技术想象 (Sociotechnical imaginaries, SIs) 已成为科学技术研究 (Science and Technology Studies, STS) 领域中一个热门且富有创意的概念。本文通过对相关文献的回顾,并结合爱尔兰反水力压裂想象的实证案例研究,探讨了 SIs 的情感成分,提出了如何从情感技术政治学的角度对 SIs 进行理论化的方法。文献综述确定了 SIs 中需要更连贯地概念化情感的三个关键方面:想象的乌托邦、生产性和集体化维度。在 SIs 文献中,诸如欲望和恐惧等情感表现得尤为突出,但需要进一步发展。我利用自己研究中的实证例子,概述了想象中的情感的这种更深入理解可能是什么样子。我考察了情感在爱尔兰反水力压裂想象的发展和解决过程中所扮演的角色,强调了情感的密集、多模态和动态性质如何支撑了 SIs 的生产性、集体性和乌托邦性维度。最后,我对这种经过发展的情感理论如何使 STS 研究人员能够解决人性、代表性和构建更美好世界的问题进行了一些评论。