Lawless Christopher James
Department of Sociology, Durham University, 32 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN UK.
Biosocieties. 2022;17(3):506-526. doi: 10.1057/s41292-021-00231-x. Epub 2021 May 5.
This article critically examines UK biometric policymaking by charting the bodies identified by the 2018 Home Office Biometric Strategy as playing key roles in the oversight of biometric data used in law enforcement and other related functions. The article argues that oversight actors are embedded in biometric imaginaries promoted by the UK Home Office and the devolved Scottish administration. By mapping oversight of UK biometrics policy together with developments in Scotland, the article challenges sociotechnical imaginaries studies which assume the power of national governments to project dominant, cohesive and instrumental visions. The article peels away that image to reveal UK biometric policy as located within a patchwork in which embedded commissioners, regulators and advisors challenge biometric imaginaries through interpretive flexibility and standpoint. By identifying technical, operational, legislative and ethical issues, these actors challenge the UK government imaginary and act as channels of critique between it and wider stakeholder communities. The article further challenges assumptions concerning the cohesion of national imaginaries by highlighting a diverging approach to biometric governance in Scotland. The article uses these observations to sketch a means to further characterise the notion of the biometric imaginary and to address biometric policymaking more widely.
本文通过梳理2018年内政部生物识别战略所认定的在执法及其他相关职能中使用的生物识别数据监督方面发挥关键作用的机构,对英国生物识别政策制定进行了批判性审视。文章认为,监督行为体嵌入英国内政部和权力下放的苏格兰行政部门所推动的生物识别想象之中。通过绘制英国生物识别政策的监督情况以及苏格兰的发展情况,本文对社会技术想象研究提出了挑战,这些研究假定国家政府有能力投射占主导地位、连贯且具工具性的愿景。本文揭开了这一表象,揭示出英国生物识别政策处于一种拼凑状态,其中嵌入式专员、监管机构和顾问通过解释灵活性和立场来挑战生物识别想象。通过识别技术、操作、立法和伦理问题,这些行为体挑战了英国政府的想象,并充当其与更广泛利益相关者群体之间的批评渠道。本文通过强调苏格兰在生物识别治理方面的不同方法,进一步挑战了有关国家想象凝聚力的假设。本文利用这些观察结果勾勒出一种方法,以进一步界定生物识别想象的概念,并更广泛地应对生物识别政策制定问题。