• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Coparenting Relationship Scale(CRS)在 10 个国家的测量不变性。

Measurement invariance of the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS) across 10 countries.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Lausanne.

Department of Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2024 Aug;38(5):697-706. doi: 10.1037/fam0001228. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1037/fam0001228
PMID:38842872
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the factor structure and the measurement invariance of the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS) across 10 countries based on the seven-factor coparenting model (i.e., Coparenting Agreement, Coparenting Closeness, Exposure to Conflict, Coparenting Support, Endorsement of Partner's Parenting; Division of Labor) proposed by Feinberg (2003). The results of research on coparenting from numerous countries have documented its foundational importance for parent mental health, family relationship quality, child development, and psychopathology. Yet, a cross-country perspective is still lacking. Such a perspective can provide insight into which dimensions of coparenting are universally recognized and which are especially prone to variation. A unique multinational data set, comprised of 15 individual studies collected across 10 countries (Belgium, Brazil, China, Israel, Italy, Japan, Portugal, Switzerland, Turkey, USA) in nine languages was established ( = 9,292; 51.1% mothers). Measurement invariance analyses were conducted. A six-factor structure (original seven factors minus Division of Labor) of the measure was consistent across the different contexts and measurement invariance was achieved at the configural level. There was no support for metric or scalar invariance. These findings provide a basis for the CRS to be used across countries and should inspire future quantitative and qualitative research in cross-country coparenting research to understand what aspects are universal and what aspects of coparenting are linked to specific material, relational, or ideational conditions that underlie high-quality coparenting. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究旨在基于 Feinberg(2003 年)提出的七因素共同养育模式(即共同养育协议、共同养育亲密关系、冲突暴露、共同养育支持、对伴侣养育方式的认可、分工),评估 10 个国家的共同养育关系量表(CRS)的因素结构和测量不变性。来自多个国家的共同养育研究结果证明了其对父母心理健康、家庭关系质量、儿童发展和精神病理学的基础重要性。然而,目前仍缺乏跨国视角。这种视角可以深入了解哪些共同养育维度是普遍认可的,哪些维度特别容易发生变化。一个独特的跨国数据集由 15 项独立研究组成,涵盖了 10 个国家(比利时、巴西、中国、以色列、意大利、日本、葡萄牙、瑞士、土耳其、美国)的 9 种语言(=9292;51.1%为母亲)。进行了测量不变性分析。该测量的六因素结构(原始七因素减去分工)在不同背景下具有一致性,并在组态水平上实现了测量不变性。没有支持度量或标度不变性。这些发现为 CRS 在国家间的使用提供了基础,并应激发未来跨国共同养育研究中的定量和定性研究,以了解哪些方面是普遍的,以及共同养育的哪些方面与特定的物质、关系或观念条件有关,这些条件是高质量共同养育的基础。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Measurement invariance of the Coparenting Relationship Scale (CRS) across 10 countries.Coparenting Relationship Scale(CRS)在 10 个国家的测量不变性。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Aug;38(5):697-706. doi: 10.1037/fam0001228. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Measurement invariance in the assessment of parenting practices: A cross-cultural comparison of China and the United States.父母教养实践评估中的测量不变性:中、美跨文化比较。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Sep;37(6):774-785. doi: 10.1037/fam0001099. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Child-parent interactions in American and Turkish families: Examining measurement invariance analysis of child-parent relationship scale.美国家庭和土耳其家庭中的亲子互动:检验儿童-父母关系量表的测量不变性分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 3;15(4):e0230831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230831. eCollection 2020.
4
Parenting measurement, normativeness, and associations with child outcomes: Comparing evidence from four non-Western cultures.养育测量、规范性及其与儿童结果的关联:比较来自四个非西方文化的证据。
Dev Sci. 2024 Sep;27(5):e13388. doi: 10.1111/desc.13388. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).评估心理体验社区评估量表(CAPE)在跨国间的不变性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2600-2607. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003574. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
A cross-country examination of emotional eating, restrained eating and intuitive eating: Measurement Invariance across eight countries.跨国考察情绪性进食、抑制性进食和直觉性进食:八个国家的测量不变性。
Body Image. 2020 Dec;35:245-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.09.013. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
7
When not teaming up puts parents at risk: Coparenting and parental burnout in dual-parent heterosexual families in Switzerland.当不合作会使父母面临风险时:瑞士双亲异性恋家庭中的共同养育和父母倦怠。
Fam Process. 2023 Mar;62(1):272-286. doi: 10.1111/famp.12777. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
8
Measurement Invariance of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience Across 13 Countries.积极与消极经验量表在 13 个国家的跨文化不变性测量。
Assessment. 2022 Oct;29(7):1507-1521. doi: 10.1177/10731911211021494. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
9
Cross-cultural applicability of the Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in a multi-national study.跨文化适用性的自我护理自我效能感量表在一个多国家的研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):681-692. doi: 10.1111/jan.14617. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
Low-income, nonresident fathers' coparenting with multiple mothers and relatives: Effects on fathering.低收入非居民父亲与多位母亲及亲属共同抚养子女:对其为人父角色的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):665-675. doi: 10.1037/fam0000231. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Coparenting Relationship Scale in Ecuadorian Parents.厄瓜多尔父母共同养育关系量表的心理测量特性
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Jun 25;15(7):117. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15070117.