Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 May;54(3):55-56. doi: 10.1002/hast.1591.
This commentary responds to Moti Gorin's article "What Is the Aim of Pediatric 'Gender-Affirming' Care?" We argue that Gorin's case against pediatric gender-affirming care rests upon numerous false conceptual binaries: female/male, public/private, objective/subjective, and medically necessary/elective. Drawing on feminist bioethics, we show how such dichotomous thinking is both inaccurate and marginalizing of gender minorities.
这篇评论是对莫蒂·戈林（Moti Gorin）的文章《儿科“性别肯定”护理的目的是什么？》的回应。我们认为，戈林反对儿科性别肯定护理的理由建立在众多错误的概念二分法之上：女性/男性、公共/私人、客观/主观、医学上必需/选择性。我们借鉴女性主义生命伦理学，展示了这种二元思维是如何既不准确又将性别少数群体边缘化的。
