Department of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.
North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, Asheville, North Carolina.
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Aug;75(2):305-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
This study investigated place-based differences in the association between greenspace and suicide-related outcomes (SROs) among young people, guided by the following two objectives: (1) Contextualize place-based differences in the association between greenspace and SRO prevalence among young people at the community level in five different urbanities (urban, suburban, micropolitan, small towns, and rural/isolated communities) and (2) identify which greenspace metrics (quantity, quality, or accessibility) are most protective for SROs at the community level.
Publicly available greenspace datasets were used to derive greenspace quantity, quality, and accessibility metrics. SRO emergency department visits for young people were identified from 2016-2019 in North Carolina, USA. Generalized linear models investigated the association between greenspace metrics and community-level drivers of SRO prevalence. Shapely additive explanations confirmed the most important greenspace variables in accurately predicting community-level SRO prevalence.
The prevalence of SROs was highest in communities with the least amount of public greenspace; this association was most pronounced in suburban communities, with SROs 27% higher in suburban communities with low quantities of greenspace (PRR: 1.11, confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.13; PRR: 1.27, CI: 1.10-1.46; PRR: 1.21, CI: 1.05-1.39), and in communities with the worst greenspace accessibility (i.e., furthest distance to nearest greenspace) (PRR: 1.07, CI: 1.04-1.10; PRR: 1.95, CI: 1.54-2.49).
Our analysis provides place-based, community-specific findings to guide targeted greenspace interventions aimed at addressing the rising prevalence of SROs among young people. Our findings suggest that greenspace quantity interventions may be most effective in urban, suburban, and small-town communities, and greenspace accessibility interventions may be most useful in urban and rural/isolated communities.
本研究旨在探讨年轻人的绿地与自杀相关结果(SRO)之间的关联存在基于地点的差异,具体目标如下:(1)在五个不同城市化程度(城市、郊区、微城市、小镇和农村/偏远社区)的社区层面,将年轻人的绿地与 SRO 患病率之间的关联的基于地点的差异具体化;(2)确定哪些绿地指标(数量、质量或可达性)对社区层面的 SRO 最具保护作用。
使用公共绿地数据集得出绿地数量、质量和可达性指标。2016-2019 年,在美国北卡罗来纳州的年轻人的急诊部门就诊中确定了 SRO。广义线性模型调查了绿地指标与 SRO 患病率的社区水平驱动因素之间的关联。Shapley 附加解释证实了最能准确预测社区层面 SRO 患病率的最重要绿地变量。
SRO 患病率在绿地数量最少的社区中最高;这种关联在郊区社区最为明显,绿地数量较低的郊区社区 SRO 患病率高出 27%(RR:1.11,置信区间[CI]:1.08-1.13;RR:1.27,CI:1.10-1.46;RR:1.21,CI:1.05-1.39),绿地可达性最差(即距离最近绿地最远)的社区(RR:1.07,CI:1.04-1.10;RR:1.95,CI:1.54-2.49)。
我们的分析提供了基于地点的、特定于社区的发现,以指导有针对性的绿地干预措施,旨在解决年轻人中 SRO 患病率上升的问题。我们的研究结果表明,在城市、郊区和小镇社区,绿地数量干预可能最有效,而在城市和农村/偏远社区,绿地可达性干预可能最有用。