Institute for Housing and Urban Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jun;74(6):534-540. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213443. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Concerns about loss of greenspace with urbanisation motivate much research on nature and health; however, contingency of greenspace-health associations on the character of community change remains understudied.
With aggregate data from governmental sources for 1432 Swedish parishes, we used negative binomial regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality during 2000-2008 in relation to percentage area (in 2000) of urban residential greenspace, urban parks and rural greenspace, looking across parishes with decrease, stability or increase in population density. We also assessed interactions between land use and population change.
Parishes with ≥1 decile increase in population density had lower incidence of all-cause (IRR=0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95) and CVD mortality (IRR=0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) compared with parishes with stable populations. In stable parishes, all-cause mortality was lower with higher percentages of urban green (IRR=0.998, 95% CI 0.996 to 1.000) and rural green land uses (IRR=0.997, 95% CI 0.996 to 0.999). These results were inverted in densifying parishes; higher all-cause mortality attended higher initial percentages of urban (IRR=1.081, 95% CI 1.037 to 1.127) and rural greenspace (IRR=1.042, 95% CI 1.007 to 1.079) as measured in 2000. Similar associations held for CVD mortality.
More greenspace was associated with lower all-cause and CVD mortality in communities with relatively stable populations. In densifying communities, population growth per se may reduce mortality, but it may also entail harm through reductions in amount per capita and/or quality of greenspace.
城市化过程中对绿地损失的担忧促使人们对自然与健康进行了大量研究;然而,绿地与健康之间的关联在多大程度上取决于社区变化的特征仍研究不足。
我们利用来自政府部门的 1432 个瑞典教区的综合数据,使用负二项回归分析来估计 2000 年至 2008 年期间全因和心血管疾病死亡率与城市居住绿地、城市公园和农村绿地面积(2000 年)百分比之间的发生率比值(IRR),并观察人口密度下降、稳定或增加的教区。我们还评估了土地利用与人口变化之间的相互作用。
与人口密度稳定的教区相比,人口密度增加≥1 个十分位数的教区的全因死亡率(IRR=0.91,95%置信区间 0.87 至 0.95)和心血管疾病死亡率(IRR=0.89,95%置信区间 0.84 至 0.94)较低。在人口稳定的教区,城市绿地(IRR=0.998,95%置信区间 0.996 至 1.000)和农村绿地的比例越高,全因死亡率越低(IRR=0.997,95%置信区间 0.996 至 0.999)。在人口密集化的教区,这些结果则相反;较高的全因死亡率与较高的城市初始绿地比例(IRR=1.081,95%置信区间 1.037 至 1.127)和农村绿地比例(IRR=1.042,95%置信区间 1.007 至 1.079)相关。心血管疾病死亡率也存在类似的关联。
在人口相对稳定的社区中,绿地面积越大,全因和心血管疾病死亡率越低。在人口密集化的社区中,人口增长本身可能会降低死亡率,但也可能会通过减少人均绿地数量和/或降低绿地质量而带来危害。