Programa de Doctorado en Medicina de la Conservación, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile; Departamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Coastal Ecology Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Environ Pollut. 2024 Sep 1;356:124317. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124317. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) threatens to disrupt most natural habitats and species, including those in coastal settings, where a growing number of studies have identified ALAN impacts. A careful examination of the light properties behind those impacts is important to better understand and manage the effects of this stressor. This study focused on ALAN monochromatic wavelengths and examined which types of light spectra altered the natural activity of two prominent coastal species from the Pacific southeast: the talitroid amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata and the oniscoid isopod Tylos spinulosus. We compared the natural daylight/night activity of these organisms with the one they exhibit when exposed to five different ALAN wavelengths: lights in the violet, blue, green, amber, and red spectra. Our working hypothesis was that ALAN alters these species' activity at night, but the magnitude of such impact differs depending on light wavelengths. Measurements of activity over 24 h cycles for five consecutive days and in three separate experiments confirmed a natural circadian activity pattern in both species, with strong activity at night (∼90% of probability) and barely any activity during daylight. However, when exposed to ALAN, activity declined significantly in both species under all light wavelengths. Interestingly, amphipods exhibited moderate activity (∼40% of probability) when exposed to red lights at night, whereas isopods shifted some of their activity to daylight hours in two of the experiments when exposed to blue or amber lights, suggesting a possible alteration in this species circadian rhythm. Altogether, our results were consistent with our working hypothesis, and suggest that ALAN reduces night activity, and some wavelengths have differential effects on each species. Differences between amphipods and isopods are likely related to their distinct adaptations to natural low-light habitat conditions, and therefore distinct sensitivity to ALAN.
人工夜间光照(ALAN)有可能扰乱大多数自然栖息地和物种,包括沿海地区的物种,越来越多的研究已经确定了 ALAN 的影响。仔细研究这些影响背后的光照特性对于更好地理解和管理这种应激源的影响非常重要。本研究重点关注 ALAN 的单色波长,并研究了哪些类型的光谱改变了来自太平洋东南部的两种突出的沿海物种的自然活动:talitroid 端足类动物 Orchestoidea tuberculata 和 oniscoid 等足类动物 Tylos spinulosus。我们将这些生物的自然日光/夜间活动与它们在暴露于五种不同 ALAN 波长时表现出的活动进行了比较:紫光、蓝光、绿光、琥珀光和红光光谱中的灯光。我们的工作假设是,ALAN 会改变这些物种在夜间的活动,但这种影响的幅度因波长而异。在三个独立的实验中,对五个连续日的 24 小时周期内的活动进行了测量,证实了这两个物种都存在自然的昼夜节律活动模式,夜间活动强烈(约 90%的可能性),白天几乎没有任何活动。然而,当暴露于 ALAN 时,两种物种在所有波长的光照下的活动都显著下降。有趣的是,当暴露于红光下时,端足类动物表现出中等活动(约 40%的可能性),而当暴露于蓝光或琥珀光下时,两种实验中的一些等足类动物将其活动转移到白天,这表明该物种的昼夜节律可能发生了变化。总的来说,我们的结果与我们的工作假设一致,表明 ALAN 减少了夜间活动,并且一些波长对每个物种有不同的影响。端足类动物和等足类动物之间的差异可能与其对自然低光照生境条件的不同适应有关,因此对 ALAN 的敏感性也不同。