Koo Hye Yeon, Cho In Young, Han Kyungdo, Lee Kyu Na, Cho Mi Hee, Jin Sang-Man, Cho Yang Hyun, Lee Jun Ho, Park Yang-Jin, Shin Dong Wook
Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Family Medicine & Supportive Care Centre, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;68(4):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.05.042. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
This retrospective cohort study aimed to confirm the previously reported inverse association between diabetes mellitus (DM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) using large population based data. It also investigated the associations between AAA and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and new onset DM (not yet treated).
A representative dataset was obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Participants who were aged ≥ 50 years and received a national health examination in 2009 were included and followed until 31 December 2019. Glycaemic status was defined based on fasting plasma glucose level and the relevant diagnostic codes. AAA was ascertained using medical facility use records with relevant diagnostic codes or aneurysm repair surgery. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association between glycaemic status and AAA, with adjustment for confounders. Additionally, the interactions between glycaemic status and subgroups based on baseline characteristics were examined.
The study population comprised 4 162 640 participants. Participants with IFG or DM were significantly more likely to be male, older, and have comorbidities compared with normoglycaemic participants at baseline. The incidence of AAA was lower in participants with IFG or DM compared with normoglycaemic participants. The AAA risk was lower in patients with DM than in patients with IFG, and decreased linearly according to glycaemic status: the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85 - 0.91) for IFG, 0.72 (95% CI 0.67 - 0.78) for newly diagnosed DM, 0.65 (95% CI 0.61 - 0.69) for DM duration < 5 years, and 0.47 (95% CI 0.44 - 0.51) for DM duration ≥ 5 years compared with the normoglycaemia group. Both IFG and DM were related to reduced AAA risk in all subgroups, suggesting an independent association.
Both IFG and DM, even when not treated with antihyperglycaemic medication, were associated with a lower incidence of AAA. The AAA risk decreased linearly according to DM duration.
这项回顾性队列研究旨在利用基于大人群的数据,证实先前报道的糖尿病(DM)与腹主动脉瘤(AAA)之间的负相关关系。该研究还调查了AAA与空腹血糖受损(IFG)以及新发糖尿病(尚未接受治疗)之间的关联。
从韩国国民健康保险服务中心获取了一个代表性数据集。纳入年龄≥50岁且在2009年接受过全国健康检查的参与者,并随访至2019年12月31日。根据空腹血糖水平和相关诊断代码定义血糖状态。使用具有相关诊断代码的医疗设施使用记录或动脉瘤修复手术来确定AAA。采用Cox比例风险模型来检验血糖状态与AAA之间的关联,并对混杂因素进行调整。此外,还研究了血糖状态与基于基线特征的亚组之间的相互作用。
研究人群包括4162640名参与者。与基线时血糖正常的参与者相比,患有IFG或DM的参与者更可能为男性、年龄更大且患有合并症。与血糖正常的参与者相比,患有IFG或DM的参与者中AAA的发病率更低。DM患者的AAA风险低于IFG患者,并且根据血糖状态呈线性下降:与血糖正常组相比,IFG的调整后风险比为0.88(95%置信区间[CI] 0.85 - 0.91),新诊断DM为0.72(95%CI 0.67 - 0.78),DM病程<5年为0.65(95%CI 0.61 - 0.69),DM病程≥5年为0.47(95%CI 0.44 - 0.51)。IFG和DM在所有亚组中均与降低的AAA风险相关,表明存在独立关联。
即使未使用降糖药物治疗,IFG和DM均与较低的AAA发病率相关。AAA风险根据DM病程呈线性下降。