• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤项目在学术健康网络系统中 12 年的价值评估。

Trauma Program Value Assessment at an Academic Health Network System Over 12 Years.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Marshall Institute for Interdisciplinary Research (MIIR), Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA.

Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Marshall University School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2958-2968. doi: 10.1177/00031348241259045. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1177/00031348241259045
PMID:38844859
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a leading cause of global death, with 200 000 deaths and over 3 million non-fatal injuries/year in the United States. We aim to assess trauma care value for patients who underwent urgent laparotomies (LAP) and thoracotomies (THO) in our Health Network System.

METHODS

Clinical variables (v = 84) from trauma patients (>18 yo) were retrieved retrospectively (Jan-2010 to July-2016) and prospectively (Aug-2016 to Sept-2021) from a Health System warehouse under IRB-approved protocols. Patients were divided according to their Injury Severity Score (ISS) into mild/moderate cases (ISS <15) and severe cases (ISS >15). Value was assessed using quality and cost domains. Quality surrogates included graded postoperative complications (PCs), length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission (RA), patient satisfaction (PS), and textbook (TB) cases. Total charges (TCs) and reimbursement index ( were included as surrogates for cost. Value domains were displayed in scorecards comparing Observed (O) with Expected (E) (using the ACS risk calculator) outcomes. Uni-/multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS.

RESULTS

41,927 trauma evaluations were performed, leading to 16 044 admissions, with 528 (3.2%) patients requiring urgent surgical procedures (LAP = 413 and THO = 115). Although the M:F ratio (7:3) was similar in LAP vs THO groups, age and BMI were significantly different (41.8 ± 19.1 vs 51.8 ± 19.9 years, 28.6 ± 9.9 vs 27.4 ± 7 Kg/m, respectively, < .05). Blunt trauma was involved in 68.8/77.3% of the LAP/THO procedures, respectively ( < .05). Multivariate analyses showed ISS, age, ASA class, and medical center as factors significantly predicting PC ( < .05). Postoperative complication grades from the LAP/THO groups showed above-average outcomes; nonetheless, LOS was higher than the national averages.

CONCLUSIONS

The Trauma Program holds high value in our Health Network System. Protocols for decreasing LOS are being implemented.

摘要

背景

创伤是导致全球死亡的主要原因,在美国,每年有 20 万人死亡,300 多万人遭受非致命性伤害/年。我们旨在评估我们的医疗网络系统中接受紧急剖腹术(LAP)和开胸术(THO)的患者的创伤护理价值。

方法

从医疗系统仓库中回顾性(2010 年 1 月至 2016 年 7 月)和前瞻性(2016 年 8 月至 2021 年 9 月)检索(>18 岁)创伤患者的临床变量(v = 84),并根据损伤严重程度评分(ISS)将患者分为轻度/中度病例(ISS<15)和严重病例(ISS>15)。使用质量和成本领域评估价值。质量替代指标包括分级术后并发症(PC)、住院时间(LOS)、30 天再入院(RA)、患者满意度(PS)和教科书(TB)病例。总费用(TCs)和报销指数(作为成本的替代指标。使用 ACS 风险计算器显示观察值(O)与预期值(E)之间的差值(O-E)的记分卡比较了价值域。使用 SPSS 进行单变量/多变量分析。

结果

进行了 41,927 次创伤评估,导致 16,044 例入院,其中 528 例(3.2%)患者需要紧急手术(LAP = 413 例,THO = 115 例)。尽管 LAP 与 THO 组的 M:F 比值(7:3)相似,但年龄和 BMI 差异显著(41.8±19.1 与 51.8±19.9 岁,28.6±9.9 与 27.4±7kg/m,分别,<.05)。LAP/THO 手术分别涉及 68.8%/77.3%的钝性创伤(<.05)。多变量分析显示,ISS、年龄、ASA 分级和医疗中心是显著预测 PC 的因素(<.05)。LAP/THO 组的术后并发症分级显示出高于平均水平的结果;然而,住院时间高于全国平均水平。

结论

我们的医疗网络系统中的创伤计划具有很高的价值。正在实施降低 LOS 的方案。

相似文献

1
Trauma Program Value Assessment at an Academic Health Network System Over 12 Years.创伤项目在学术健康网络系统中 12 年的价值评估。
Am Surg. 2024 Nov;90(11):2958-2968. doi: 10.1177/00031348241259045. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Comparison of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status to predict operative trauma mortality in elderly patients.比较国家手术质量改进计划手术风险计算器、创伤和损伤严重程度评分以及美国麻醉师协会身体状况评分,以预测老年患者手术创伤死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Mar 1;92(3):481-488. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003481.
3
A Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Trauma and Injury Severity Score, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status, and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Calculator's Ability to Predict Operative Trauma Outcomes.前瞻性多中心创伤和损伤严重程度评分、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况评分和国家手术质量改进计划计算器预测手术创伤结局能力的比较。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1260-1266. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006802. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Early hospital readmission in the trauma population: are the risk factors different?创伤患者的早期医院再入院:危险因素是否不同?
Injury. 2014 Jan;45(1):56-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.029. Epub 2013 May 30.
5
Trauma patient readmissions: Why do they come back for more?创伤患者再入院:他们为何再次入院?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Nov;79(5):717-24; discussion 724-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000844.
6
Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome.老年人创伤:重症监护病房资源利用与结局
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):407-14. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00001.
7
Obesity and Associated Outcomes for Blunt vs Penetrating Mechanism in Trauma Laparotomy Patients.肥胖与钝性与穿透性机制在创伤剖腹手术患者中的相关性研究。
Am Surg. 2024 Aug;90(8):2120-2123. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241725. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
8
Early unplanned trauma readmissions in a safety net hospital are resource intensive but not due to resource limitations.在一家安全网医院,早期非计划创伤再入院资源消耗大,但并非因资源限制所致。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):135-138. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001540.
9
Association of Psychosocial Factors and Hospital Complications with Risk for Readmission After Trauma.心理社会因素与医院并发症与创伤后再入院风险的关系。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
10
Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients.老年创伤患者的发病率和死亡率。
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):702-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00024.