Suppr超能文献

老年创伤患者的发病率和死亡率。

Morbidity and mortality in elderly trauma patients.

作者信息

Tornetta P, Mostafavi H, Riina J, Turen C, Reimer B, Levine R, Behrens F, Geller J, Ritter C, Homel P

机构信息

University Hospital of Brooklyn, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):702-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite an increasing incidence, relatively few studies have examined the factors that predict morbidity and mortality in older patients and several reports have found standard predictors such as the Injury Severity Score to be less useful in this patient population. Similarly, the effect of skeletal injury has not been examined with regard to complications and mortality. The purpose of this study was to review a large multicenter experience with elderly trauma patients to isolate factors that might predict morbidity and mortality. The potential effect of skeletal long-bone injury was of particular interest.

METHODS

The charts of all patients older than 60 years who were admitted to one of four Level I trauma centers after sustaining blunt trauma were reviewed. Mechanisms of injury included in the study were motor vehicle crash, pedestrian struck, fall from a height, and crush injury. Slip-and-fall injuries were excluded. A total of 326 patients met inclusion criteria. Variables studied included age, sex, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, blood transfusion, fluid resuscitation, surgery performed (laparotomy, long-bone fracture stabilization, both), and timing of surgery. Outcome variables measured included incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, sepsis, myocardial infarction, deep venous thromboembolism, gastrointestinal complications, and death. chi2, logistic regression, t test, and nonparametric analyses were done as appropriate for the type of variable.

RESULTS

The average age of the patients was 72.2+/-8 years. Overall, 59 patients (18.1%) died, of whom 52 of 59 survived at least 24 hours. Statistical significance for continuous variables (p < 0.05) using univariate analysis was reached for the following factors for the patients who died: higher ISS (33.1 vs. 16.4), lower GCS score (11.5 vs. 13.9), greater transfusion requirement (10.9 vs. 2.9 U), and more fluid infused (12.4 vs. 4.9 L). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors that predicted mortality. They included (odds ratios and p values in parentheses) transfusion (1.11, p = 0.01), ISS (1.04, p = 0.008), GCS score (0.87, p = 0.007), and fluid requirement (1.06, p = 0.06). Regarding surgery, orthopedic surgery alone had an odds ratio of 0.53, indicating that orthopedic patients was less likely to die than patients who did not undergo any surgery. Patients who underwent only a general surgical procedure were 2.5 times more likely to die (p = 0.03) and patients who underwent both general and orthopedic procedures were 1.5 times more likely to die (p = 0.32) than patients who did not require surgery. Early (< or =24 hours) versus late (>24 hours) surgery for bony stabilization did not have a statistical effect on mortality (11% early vs. 18% late). Two patients in need of bony stabilization, however, died before these procedures were performed. With regard to complications, regression analysis revealed that ISS predicted adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, sepsis, and gastrointestinal complications; fluid transfusion predicted myocardial infusion; and need for surgery and transfusion requirements predicted sepsis. These complications, in turn, were significant risk factors for mortality. This large series of elderly patients demonstrates that mortality correlates closely with ISS and is influenced by blood and fluid requirements and by GCS score. The institution-specific mortality was the same when adjusted for ISS. The need for orthopedic surgery and the timing of the surgery was not a risk factor for systemic complications or mortality in this series.

CONCLUSION

Mortality is predicted by ISS and by complications in older patients. Seventy-seven percent of the orthopedic injuries were stabilized early, but the timing of surgery did not have any statistical effect on the incidence of complications or mortality. (ABSTRACT TRUNCA

摘要

背景

尽管发病率不断上升,但针对老年患者发病和死亡预测因素的研究相对较少,并且一些报告发现诸如损伤严重度评分等标准预测指标在这一患者群体中作用较小。同样,骨骼损伤对并发症和死亡率的影响尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是回顾大量老年创伤患者的多中心经验,以找出可能预测发病和死亡的因素。骨骼长骨损伤的潜在影响尤其令人关注。

方法

回顾了4家一级创伤中心收治的所有60岁以上钝性创伤患者的病历。纳入研究的损伤机制包括机动车碰撞、行人被撞、高处坠落和挤压伤。排除滑倒受伤。共有326例患者符合纳入标准。研究的变量包括年龄、性别、损伤机制、损伤严重度评分(ISS)、修订创伤评分、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、输血、液体复苏、实施的手术(剖腹术、长骨骨折固定术、两者皆有)以及手术时机。测量的结局变量包括成人呼吸窘迫综合征、肺炎、败血症、心肌梗死、深静脉血栓栓塞、胃肠道并发症及死亡的发生率。根据变量类型酌情进行卡方检验、逻辑回归分析、t检验和非参数分析。

结果

患者的平均年龄为72.2±8岁。总体而言,59例患者(18.1%)死亡,其中59例中有52例存活至少24小时。对于死亡患者,单因素分析中连续变量达到统计学显著性(p<0.05)的因素如下:较高的ISS(33.1对16.4)、较低的GCS评分(11.5对13.9)、更高的输血需求(10.9对2.9单位)以及更多的液体输注量(12.4对4.9升)。进行逻辑回归分析以确定预测死亡率的因素。这些因素包括(括号内为比值比和p值)输血(1.11,p = 0.01)、ISS(1.04,p = 0.008)、GCS评分(0.87,p = 0.007)以及液体需求量(1.06,p = 0.06)。关于手术,仅进行骨科手术的比值比为0.53,表明骨科手术患者死亡的可能性低于未接受任何手术的患者。仅接受普通外科手术的患者死亡可能性是未接受手术患者的2.5倍(p = 0.03),而接受普通外科和骨科手术的患者死亡可能性是未接受手术患者的1.5倍(p = 0.32)。早期(≤24小时)与晚期(>24小时)进行骨稳定手术对死亡率没有统计学影响(早期为11%,晚期为18%)。然而,2例需要进行骨稳定手术的患者在手术前死亡。关于并发症,回归分析显示ISS可预测成人呼吸窘迫综合征、肺炎、败血症和胃肠道并发症;液体输血可预测心肌梗死;手术需求和输血需求可预测败血症。这些并发症反过来又是死亡率的重要危险因素。这一大组老年患者表明,死亡率与ISS密切相关,并受血液和液体需求量以及GCS评分的影响。根据ISS进行调整后,各机构的死亡率相同。在本系列中,骨科手术需求和手术时机不是全身并发症或死亡率的危险因素。

结论

老年患者的死亡率可通过ISS和并发症来预测。77%的骨科损伤早期得到了稳定处理,但手术时机对并发症发生率或死亡率没有任何统计学影响。(摘要截断)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验