Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Willamette Valley Cancer Institute & Research Center/US Oncology Research, Eugene, OR, USA.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Sep;24(9):e301-e313. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.05.009. Epub 2024 May 13.
informCLL is the largest US-based prospective, observational registry of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) initiating FDA-approved treatment in the era of targeted therapy.
Patients were enrolled between October 2015 and June 2019. Data were collected for baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety.
In total, 1459 eligible patients were enrolled (first line, n = 854; relapsed/refractory, n = 605). The most common index treatments were ibrutinib (first line, 45%; relapsed/refractory, 49%) and chemoimmunotherapy (first line, 43%; relapsed/refractory, 20%). With median follow-up of 31.8 and 30.9 months in first-line and relapsed/refractory cohorts, respectively, median time to next treatment (TTNT) in patients who received any index treatment was not reached (NR) and 48.6 months; estimated proportions without next-line therapy at 48 months were 64% and 50%. Median overall survival (OS) was NR for both cohorts; estimated 48-month OS rates were 81% and 64% in first-line and relapsed/refractory cohorts, respectively. In match-adjusted analyses, TTNT was improved with first-line ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy (median NR vs. 56.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98). Exposure-adjusted rates of AEs leading to discontinuation and serious AEs were lower with ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy. Estimated 36-month OS rates were similar in Black versus White patients who received any index treatment (first line, 87% vs. 83%; relapsed/refractory, 74% vs. 74%) or ibrutinib (first line, 97% vs. 85%; relapsed/refractory, 81% vs. 77%).
In this prospective, large, real-world CLL registry, first-line ibrutinib was associated with longer TTNT than chemoimmunotherapy, with sustained benefit up to 4 years of follow-up.
informatCLL 是美国最大的、针对接受靶向治疗时代的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的前瞻性、观察性注册研究。
患者于 2015 年 10 月至 2019 年 6 月入组。收集基线特征、治疗模式、结局和安全性数据。
共纳入 1459 例符合条件的患者(一线治疗,n=854;复发/难治性,n=605)。最常见的一线治疗药物是伊布替尼(一线治疗,45%;复发/难治性,49%)和化疗免疫治疗(一线治疗,43%;复发/难治性,20%)。在一线和复发/难治性队列中,中位随访时间分别为 31.8 和 30.9 个月,接受任何一线治疗的患者中位无进展生存期(TTNT)未达到(NR)和 48.6 个月;估计 48 个月时无下一线治疗的比例分别为 64%和 50%。两组患者的中位总生存期(OS)均未达到(NR);估计一线和复发/难治性队列中 48 个月的 OS 率分别为 81%和 64%。在匹配调整分析中,与化疗免疫治疗相比,一线伊布替尼可改善 TTNT(中位 NR 与 56.5 个月;危险比,0.74;95%CI,0.56-0.98)。与化疗免疫治疗相比,伊布替尼的药物相关不良事件(AE)导致停药和严重 AE 的发生率较低。在接受任何一线治疗(一线,87%与 83%;复发/难治性,74%与 74%)或伊布替尼(一线,97%与 85%;复发/难治性,81%与 77%)的黑人和白人患者中,估计 36 个月的 OS 率相似。
在这项前瞻性、大型、真实世界的 CLL 注册研究中,与化疗免疫治疗相比,一线伊布替尼的 TTNT 更长,在 4 年的随访中持续获益。