Suppr超能文献

根据风险状况,一线伊布替尼或化疗免疫治疗在慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中的真实世界临床结局。

Real-world Clinical Outcomes of First-Line Ibrutinib or Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia by Risk Status.

机构信息

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA.

EPI-Q, Inc., 915 Harger Rd, Suite 350, Oak Brook, IL, USA.

出版信息

Adv Ther. 2022 Jul;39(7):3292-3307. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01991-5. Epub 2022 May 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Certain genetic features in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are associated with inferior outcomes after chemoimmunotherapy (CIT). This retrospective study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with CLL, stratified into high-risk and non-high-risk groups, who received first-line ibrutinib or CIT therapy.

METHODS

High-risk group included confirmed presence of del(17p), del(11q), unmutated IGHV, TP53 mutations, or complex karyotype. Weighted high-risk ibrutinib and CIT groups were compared for treatment effects using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Hazard ratios [95% CI] (HR) for time to next treatment (TTNT) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Bendamustine/rituximab was the most common CIT regimen initiated for high-risk patients. During the available follow-up (median 34-35 months), 74.7% of the weighted high-risk ibrutinib group received only one line of treatment, compared with 47.2% of the weighted high-risk CIT group. The most common second-line treatment was ibrutinib for those in the CIT groups and venetoclax for the ibrutinib groups. The weighted high-risk ibrutinib group had a significantly longer TTNT (median not reached) than the weighted high-risk CIT group (median 34.4 months) and was 54% less likely to start a new treatment (HR 0.5 [0.3-0.6], P < 0.010). Among CIT-treated groups, high-risk patients had significantly shorter median TTNT than non-high-risk patients (P < 0.010). However, within the ibrutinib-treated groups, the median TTNT was similar between high-risk and non-high-risk patients (HR 2.2 [1.0-5.0]; P = 0.060).

CONCLUSION

This study found that first-line single-agent ibrutinib therapy was associated with significantly longer TTNT than CIT regimens in real-world patients with high-risk CLL. The results support the use of ibrutinib in high-risk patients. INFOGRAPHIC.

摘要

简介

慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的某些遗传特征与化疗免疫治疗(CIT)后的不良预后相关。本回顾性研究对接受一线伊布替尼或 CIT 治疗的 CLL 患者进行了分层,分为高危和非高危组,评估了他们的治疗模式和临床结局。

方法

高危组包括确认存在 del(17p)、del(11q)、未突变 IGHV、TP53 突变或复杂核型。采用逆概率治疗加权法比较加权高危伊布替尼和 CIT 组的治疗效果。采用 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析无进展生存期(TTNT)的风险比[95%置信区间](HR)。

结果

苯达莫司汀/利妥昔单抗是高危患者最常用的 CIT 方案。在可获得的随访期(中位 34-35 个月)内,加权高危伊布替尼组中有 74.7%的患者仅接受了一线治疗,而加权高危 CIT 组中有 47.2%的患者仅接受了一线治疗。CIT 组中最常见的二线治疗是伊布替尼,而伊布替尼组中最常见的二线治疗是维奈托克。加权高危伊布替尼组的 TTNT 显著长于加权高危 CIT 组(中位未达到),新发治疗的可能性降低 54%(HR 0.5 [0.3-0.6],P<0.010)。在 CIT 治疗组中,高危患者的 TTNT 明显短于非高危患者(P<0.010)。然而,在伊布替尼治疗组中,高危和非高危患者的 TTNT 中位数相似(HR 2.2 [1.0-5.0];P=0.060)。

结论

本研究发现,在真实世界的高危 CLL 患者中,一线单药伊布替尼治疗与 CIT 方案相比,TTNT 显著延长。这些结果支持在高危患者中使用伊布替尼。信息图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd17/9239963/4c27e4f06300/12325_2021_1991_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验