Whittington Dawayne, Wallace Latricia E, Shadding Cherilynn R
Strategic Evaluations, Durham, NC, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Sage Open. 2017 Jul-Sep;7(3). doi: 10.1177/2158244017727040. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) diversity research programs seek to make progress in increasing the number of underrepresented students that pursue STEM at the highest degree levels. Yet few programs have outlined their path to help students achieve the STEM PhD. Our program, Opportunities in Genomics Research (OGR), showed significant increases in PhD matriculation over 8 years of National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding. We explored typical measures, which include grade point average (GPA), institution classification, and graduate school ranking, and found that these measures alone do not explain the improved outcomes. We examined changes in the application materials as proxies for commitment to a PhD degree. These data show a significant correlation of desired degree pursuit to increased proxies and proxy type (open- or close-ended questions answered by applicant or referee). We demonstrate that changes in application procedures for diversity research programs correlate to improved program outcomes with statistical significance.
科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)领域的多元化研究项目致力于在增加攻读最高学位水平STEM专业的代表性不足学生数量方面取得进展。然而,很少有项目勾勒出帮助学生获得STEM博士学位的路径。我们的项目“基因组学研究机会”(OGR)在获得美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)八年资助期间,博士入学人数显著增加。我们研究了包括平均绩点(GPA)、院校类别和研究生院排名在内的典型指标,发现仅这些指标无法解释取得的更好成果。我们将申请材料的变化作为攻读博士学位决心的替代指标进行了研究。这些数据表明,对期望学位的追求与替代指标及替代指标类型(申请人或推荐人回答的开放式或封闭式问题)的增加之间存在显著相关性。我们证明,多元化研究项目申请程序的变化与项目成果的改善具有统计学意义上的相关性。