Farooq Khalid, Hameed Najma, Ullah Rizwan, Nawaz Akhter, Akhunzada Ikram, Muhammad Shad, Ali Wajid
Urology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.
Radiology, Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59829. eCollection 2024 May.
Background Renal calculi therapy has advanced significantly in recent years, with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) emerging as a minimally invasive treatment modality. Mini-PCNL has been subjected to several modifications to achieve the best possible outcomes and reduce morbidity. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™ in managing renal stones with mini-PCNL. Methodology This descriptive retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Lady Reading Hospital, from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. A record of male and female patients aged more than 18 years who underwent mini-PCNL for renal stones was retrieved. The following two groups of patients were created: group A (n = 25) mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and group B (n = 26) mini-PCNL with pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™. The efficacy and safety profile of both groups was compared. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled, with 25 in group A and 26 in group B. Groups A and B had mean ages of 45.2 and 47.5 years, respectively. Male participants outnumbered females in both groups, 72% (n = 18) in group A and 77% (n = 20) in group B. Group A had a mean stone size of 15.8 mm, and group B had a mean stone size of 16.5 mm. Stone-free rate on postoperative day one was 88% (n = 22) in group A and 84.6% (n = 22) in group B, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). At the end of three months, 96% of participants in group A and 84.6% of patients in group B were found to be free of stones, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 12% (n = 3) of group A and 15.4% (n = 4) of group B patients, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions There were no significant differences in stone-free rates, complication rates, or intraoperative/postoperative complications between mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ or Pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™.
背景 近年来,肾结石治疗取得了显著进展,微创经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)已成为一种微创治疗方式。微创PCNL已进行了多项改进,以实现最佳治疗效果并降低发病率。本研究旨在比较瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™和气动瑞士碎石清石系统™在微创PCNL治疗肾结石中的疗效和安全性。方法 本描述性回顾性研究于2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日在白沙瓦女读医院泌尿外科进行。检索了年龄超过18岁因肾结石接受微创PCNL治疗的男性和女性患者的记录。创建了以下两组患者:A组(n = 25)采用瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™进行微创PCNL,B组(n = 26)采用气动瑞士碎石清石系统™进行微创PCNL。比较两组的疗效和安全性。结果 共纳入51例患者,A组25例,B组26例。A组和B组的平均年龄分别为45.2岁和47.5岁。两组男性参与者均多于女性,A组为72%(n = 18),B组为77%(n = 20)。A组结石平均大小为15.8 mm,B组结石平均大小为16.5 mm。术后第1天的结石清除率A组为88%(n = 22),B组为84.6%(n = 22),差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在三个月末,A组96%的参与者和B组84.6%的患者结石清除,两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。A组12%(n = 3)和B组15.4%(n = 4)的患者发生术中出血,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论 采用瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™或气动瑞士碎石清石系统™进行微创PCNL在结石清除率、并发症发生率或术中/术后并发症方面无显著差异。