Suppr超能文献

瑞士LithoClast Trilogy™与气动瑞士LithoClast™在微创经皮肾镜取石术中结石清除率及并发症方面的比较:来自结石高发地区国家的单中心经验

Comparison of Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and Pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™ in Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Terms of Stone Free Rate and Complications: A Single-Center Experience From a Stone Belt Country.

作者信息

Farooq Khalid, Hameed Najma, Ullah Rizwan, Nawaz Akhter, Akhunzada Ikram, Muhammad Shad, Ali Wajid

机构信息

Urology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

Radiology, Northwest General Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 May 7;16(5):e59829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59829. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

Background Renal calculi therapy has advanced significantly in recent years, with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) emerging as a minimally invasive treatment modality. Mini-PCNL has been subjected to several modifications to achieve the best possible outcomes and reduce morbidity. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™ in managing renal stones with mini-PCNL. Methodology This descriptive retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Lady Reading Hospital, from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. A record of male and female patients aged more than 18 years who underwent mini-PCNL for renal stones was retrieved. The following two groups of patients were created: group A (n = 25) mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ and group B (n = 26) mini-PCNL with pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™. The efficacy and safety profile of both groups was compared. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled, with 25 in group A and 26 in group B. Groups A and B had mean ages of 45.2 and 47.5 years, respectively. Male participants outnumbered females in both groups, 72% (n = 18) in group A and 77% (n = 20) in group B. Group A had a mean stone size of 15.8 mm, and group B had a mean stone size of 16.5 mm. Stone-free rate on postoperative day one was 88% (n = 22) in group A and 84.6% (n = 22) in group B, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). At the end of three months, 96% of participants in group A and 84.6% of patients in group B were found to be free of stones, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 12% (n = 3) of group A and 15.4% (n = 4) of group B patients, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). Conclusions There were no significant differences in stone-free rates, complication rates, or intraoperative/postoperative complications between mini-PCNL with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy™ or Pneumatic Swiss LithoClast™.

摘要

背景 近年来,肾结石治疗取得了显著进展,微创经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)已成为一种微创治疗方式。微创PCNL已进行了多项改进,以实现最佳治疗效果并降低发病率。本研究旨在比较瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™和气动瑞士碎石清石系统™在微创PCNL治疗肾结石中的疗效和安全性。方法 本描述性回顾性研究于2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日在白沙瓦女读医院泌尿外科进行。检索了年龄超过18岁因肾结石接受微创PCNL治疗的男性和女性患者的记录。创建了以下两组患者:A组(n = 25)采用瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™进行微创PCNL,B组(n = 26)采用气动瑞士碎石清石系统™进行微创PCNL。比较两组的疗效和安全性。结果 共纳入51例患者,A组25例,B组26例。A组和B组的平均年龄分别为45.2岁和47.5岁。两组男性参与者均多于女性,A组为72%(n = 18),B组为77%(n = 20)。A组结石平均大小为15.8 mm,B组结石平均大小为16.5 mm。术后第1天的结石清除率A组为88%(n = 22),B组为84.6%(n = 22),差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在三个月末,A组96%的参与者和B组84.6%的患者结石清除,两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。A组12%(n = 3)和B组15.4%(n = 4)的患者发生术中出血,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论 采用瑞士碎石清石系统Trilogy™或气动瑞士碎石清石系统™进行微创PCNL在结石清除率、并发症发生率或术中/术后并发症方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/803f/11156424/84864fe0d0e5/cureus-0016-00000059829-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验