Mercury Project, Social Science Research Council, Asheville, North Carolina, USA.
Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, USA.
J Health Commun. 2024 Jun 2;29(6):407-408. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2361122. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
Doing high-quality health communications requires high-quality data, both to describe information environments and diets and as outcomes for program evaluations that seek to change them and the behaviors they foster. When we understand where people gather information, what they learn there, and how it encourages them to act, we can better diagnose where to focus energy and resources-for example, whether to amplify high-quality sources, address low-quality information, or fill information voids with actionable ideas. Too often, however, researchers collect data in ways that conflate the sources of information, the channels through which information is communicated, and the content of that information. This thwarts opportunities to identify specific problems and opportunities. We call for conceptual precision to make good use of respondents' time, to be good stewards of funders' money, and to effectively address the large challenges we face in encouraging protective, pro-social health behaviors.
做好高质量的健康传播工作需要高质量的数据,这些数据既可以用来描述信息环境和饮食,也可以作为项目评估的结果,这些评估旨在改变信息环境和促进健康行为。当我们了解人们在哪里获取信息、他们在那里学到了什么以及这些信息如何鼓励他们采取行动时,我们就能更好地确定在哪里集中精力和资源——例如,是放大高质量的信息来源,还是解决低质量的信息,或者用可操作的想法填补信息空白。然而,研究人员在收集数据时常常将信息来源、信息传播渠道和信息内容混为一谈,从而错失了识别具体问题和机会的机会。我们呼吁提高概念的精确性,以便更好地利用受访者的时间,善用资助者的资金,并有效地应对我们在鼓励保护、促进社会健康行为方面所面临的巨大挑战。