Suppr超能文献

离断式机器人辅助部分肾切除术是治疗 T1b 及以上肾肿瘤患者的安全有效方法。

Off-clamp robotic partial nephrectomy is a safe and effective approach for patients with T1b or greater renal tumors.

机构信息

Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 7;18(1):244. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01997-5.

Abstract

Robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) is a gold standard treatment for focal kidney tumors. Off-clamp RPN avoids prolonged ischemia times. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of off-clamp RPN in patients with renal tumors > 4 centimeters (cm). From 2007 to 2021, we examined patients who underwent RPN for cT1b-T2N0M0 renal tumors. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were examined for patients who underwent on or off-clamp RPN. Patients with cT1b tumors (4-7 cm) who underwent either approach were retrospectively propensity-matched based on renal function and tumor size. Of 225 patients, on-clamp RPN was employed in 147 patients, while 78 patients underwent an off-clamp approach. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in the off-clamp group (p = 0.026). Mean nephrometry scores and mean tumor sizes were similar between cohorts. Average estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative times were similar. Major complication risk was 4.4% lower in the off-clamp group. Blood transfusion rate was 5.6% lower in the off-clamp group. Patients in the off-clamp cohort experienced a < 2% higher risk of positive margins. Postoperative eGFR was more favorable for off-clamp RPN following surgery at 1 year. The propensity-matched analysis demonstrated similar intraoperative outcomes. Blood transfusion rate was significantly lower at 1.5% for patients who underwent off-clamp RPN (p = 0.03). Risk of a major complication was 6.1% lower in the off-clamp RPN cohort, while postoperative eGFR and positive margin rates were similar between off and on-clamp groups. A non-inferior approach for patients with cT1b-T2N0M0 and moderately complex localized renal masses is off-clamp RPN.

摘要

机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RPN)是治疗局灶性肾肿瘤的金标准。无夹闭 RPN 可避免长时间缺血。我们旨在评估无夹闭 RPN 在肾肿瘤 > 4 厘米(cm)患者中的安全性和有效性。2007 年至 2021 年,我们检查了接受 RPN 治疗 cT1b-T2N0M0 肾肿瘤的患者。对接受夹闭或无夹闭 RPN 的患者进行了术前、术中、术后的结果检查。根据肾功能和肿瘤大小,回顾性地对接受两种方法治疗的 cT1b 肿瘤(4-7 cm)患者进行倾向评分匹配。在 225 例患者中,147 例患者采用夹闭 RPN,78 例患者采用无夹闭方法。无夹闭组的术前估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)显著较低(p = 0.026)。两组的平均肾切除术评分和平均肿瘤大小相似。平均估计失血量(EBL)和手术时间相似。无夹闭组的主要并发症风险低 4.4%。无夹闭组的输血率低 5.6%。无夹闭组的阳性切缘率高 < 2%。无夹闭 RPN 术后 1 年 eGFR 更有利。倾向评分匹配分析显示术中结果相似。无夹闭 RPN 患者的输血率明显较低(1.5%,p = 0.03)。无夹闭 RPN 组的主要并发症风险低 6.1%,而术后 eGFR 和阳性切缘率在无夹闭和夹闭组之间相似。对于 cT1b-T2N0M0 和中度复杂局限性肾肿块的患者,非劣效方法是无夹闭 RPN。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验