• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初等概率模型在文本同质性和分段中的应用:以《圣经》为例。

Application of elementary probability models for text homogeneity and segmentation: A case study of Bible.

机构信息

Department of Statistics, MaiNefhi College of Science, Mai-Nefhi, Zoba Maekel, Eritrea.

Department of Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia Federation.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0303432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303432. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0303432
PMID:38848327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11161094/
Abstract

For the purpose of this study, A statistical test of Biblical books was conducted using the recently discovered probability models for text homogeneity and text change point detection. Accordingly, translations of Biblical books of Tigrigna and Amharic (major languages spoken in Eritrea and Ethiopia) and English were studied. A Zipf-Mandelbrot distribution with a parameter range of 0.55 to 0.88 was obtained in these three Bibles. According to the statistical analysis of the texts' homogeneity, the translation of Bible in each of these three languages was a heterogeneous concatenation of different books or genres. Furthermore, an in-depth examination of the text segmentation of prat of a single genre-the English Bible letters revealed that the Pauline letters are heterogeneous concatenations of two homogeneous segments.

摘要

本研究采用最近发现的文本同质性和文本变化点检测概率模型,对圣经书籍进行了统计检验。因此,研究了厄立特里亚和埃塞俄比亚主要语言提格里尼亚语和阿姆哈拉语以及英语的圣经书籍翻译。在这三个圣经中得到了参数范围为 0.55 到 0.88 的齐夫-曼德尔布罗特分布。根据文本同质性的统计分析,这三种语言中的每一种圣经翻译都是不同书籍或体裁的异质拼接。此外,对单一体裁(英文圣经书信)的文本分割进行深入检查后发现,保罗书信是两个同质段的异质拼接。

相似文献

1
Application of elementary probability models for text homogeneity and segmentation: A case study of Bible.初等概率模型在文本同质性和分段中的应用:以《圣经》为例。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0303432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303432. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of the books of the New Testament (English Translation) in terms of emotion and word use.新约全书各卷在情感和用词方面的比较(英文翻译)
Psychol Rep. 2006 Feb;98(1):57-64. doi: 10.2466/pr0.98.1.57-64.
3
The statistical trade-off between word order and word structure - Large-scale evidence for the principle of least effort.词序与词结构之间的统计权衡——省力原则的大规模证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 10;12(3):e0173614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173614. eCollection 2017.
4
Bibles as a possible source of pathogens in hospitals? A pilot observation.医院中《圣经》可能成为病原体来源?一项初步观察。
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):323-325. doi: 10.1007/s15010-017-0984-5. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
5
Medicinal plants of the Bible-revisited.圣经中的药用植物——再探
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019 Nov 27;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13002-019-0338-8.
6
The well of loneliness, or the gospel according to Radclyffe Hall.《寂寞之井》,或拉德克利夫·霍尔的福音书 。
J Homosex. 1997;33(3-4):163-86. doi: 10.1300/J082v33n03_08.
7
Using computer-scored measures of emotion and style to discriminate among disputed and undisputed Pauline and non-Pauline epistles.使用计算机评分的情感和风格度量来区分有争议和无争议的保罗书信及非保罗书信。
Percept Mot Skills. 2004 Jun;98(3 Pt 2):1117-25. doi: 10.2466/pms.98.3c.1117-1125.
8
A massively parallel corpus: the Bible in 100 languages.一个大规模并行语料库:100种语言版本的《圣经》
Lang Resour Eval. 2015;49(2):375-395. doi: 10.1007/s10579-014-9287-y.
9
Biblical leprosy: an anachronism whose time has come.《圣经》中的麻风病:一个不合时宜之物却迎来了它的时代。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 Mar;28(3):507-10. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(93)70071-z.
10
Left and right in the Bible from a neuropsychological perspective.从神经心理学角度看《圣经》中的左右之分。
Brain Cogn. 1994 Mar;24(2):161-83. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1009.

本文引用的文献

1
Random texts do not exhibit the real Zipf's law-like rank distribution.随机文本并不表现出真正的齐普夫定律式的等级分布。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 9;5(3):e9411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009411.