• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际(Geary-Khamis)美元中的药品价格。管制市场与非管制市场的比较。

Medicines prices in International (Geary-Khamis) Dollar. The comparison between regulated and deregulated markets.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Social Pharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

Student Scientific Society, Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Social Pharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0304400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304400. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0304400
PMID:38848422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11161061/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Affordability of medicines is key for effective healthcare. Thus, we compared medicine prices using International Dollar (I$), which allows confronting the values of different currencies. Besides, we intended to verify if pharmaceutical market deregulation leads to lower medicines prices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted the study between December 2019 and September 2022 collecting data from 21 countries. From the preliminary sampling of 30 medicines, we selected 10 brand names (5 Rx and 5 OTC brands) for the analysis. In each country, we collected price information from 3 pharmacies and then converted them to the I$ using the rates published by the International Monetary Fund.

RESULTS

There were differences between regulated and deregulated markets in prices presented in I$. For instance, Aspirin C® (10 soluble pills) was on average I$ 5.41 in Finland (regulated market) and I$ 13.25 in Brazil. The most expensive Xarelto® 20 x 28 pills (I$ 538.40) was in Romania, which in the case of other medicines, was in the group of cheaper countries. There was no statistical significance in price comparison between regulated and deregulated markets. In some cases, however, regulated markets offered lower prices of the same medicine than deregulated markets.

CONCLUSION

The analysis revealed differences in I$ prices between countries. Pharmaceutical market regulation does not mean higher prices of medicines. There is a need for affordable medicines. Hence, decision-makers should work on the medicines prices and adjust them to the local economies. I$ could be important in creating pharmaceuticals prices, and the conducted study should encourage other researchers to present their results using this currency.

摘要

背景

药品的可负担性是有效医疗保健的关键。因此,我们使用国际元(I$)比较了药品价格,这允许比较不同货币的价值。此外,我们还旨在验证药品市场放松管制是否会导致药品价格降低。

材料和方法

我们在 2019 年 12 月至 2022 年 9 月期间进行了这项研究,从 21 个国家收集数据。从最初的 30 种药品抽样中,我们选择了 10 个品牌(5 个 Rx 和 5 个 OTC 品牌)进行分析。在每个国家,我们从 3 家药店收集价格信息,然后使用国际货币基金组织公布的汇率将其转换为 I$。

结果

在 I$ 中,监管和非监管市场的价格存在差异。例如,Aspirin C®(10 片可溶性)在芬兰(监管市场)的平均价格为 I$5.41,而在巴西则为 I$13.25。最昂贵的 Xarelto®20 x 28 片(I$538.40)在罗马尼亚,而在其他药品的情况下,罗马尼亚属于价格较低的国家之列。在监管和非监管市场的价格比较中,没有统计学意义。然而,在某些情况下,监管市场提供的同一药品价格低于非监管市场。

结论

分析显示各国之间 I$价格存在差异。药品市场监管并不意味着药品价格更高。需要有负担得起的药品。因此,决策者应该关注药品价格,并根据当地经济情况进行调整。I$ 在制定药品价格方面可能很重要,进行这项研究应该鼓励其他研究人员使用这种货币来展示他们的研究结果。

相似文献

1
Medicines prices in International (Geary-Khamis) Dollar. The comparison between regulated and deregulated markets.国际(Geary-Khamis)美元中的药品价格。管制市场与非管制市场的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 7;19(6):e0304400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304400. eCollection 2024.
2
Price comparison of high-cost originator medicines in European countries.欧洲国家高成本原研药的价格比较。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):221-230. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1223543. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines for treatment of diabetes and hypertension in private pharmacies in Zambia.赞比亚私营药店治疗糖尿病和高血压的基本药物的供应、价格和可负担性。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226169. eCollection 2019.
4
Medicine prices in urban Mozambique: a public health and economic study of pharmaceutical markets and price determinants in low-income settings.莫桑比克城市的医药价格:一个公共卫生和经济研究,研究了低收入环境下的药品市场和价格决定因素。
Health Policy Plan. 2010 Jan;25(1):70-84. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp042. Epub 2009 Oct 20.
5
Relationship between pharmaceutical pricing strategies with price, availability, and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines: surveys in Qatar and Lebanon.心血管病药物的定价策略与价格、可及性和可负担性之间的关系:在卡塔尔和黎巴嫩的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4828-0.
6
Evaluation of prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Lahore Division, Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey using WHO/HAI methodology.巴基斯坦拉合尔分部基本药物的价格、可及性和可负担性评估:使用世卫组织/卫生技术评估机构方法的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216122. eCollection 2019.
7
[International reference prices and cost minimization analysis for the regulation of medicine prices in Colombia].[哥伦比亚药品价格监管的国际参考价格与成本最小化分析]
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5 Suppl 1):S16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.05.034.
8
Price discrimination in essential medicines: evidence from International Drug Price Indicator Guide data.基本药物的价格歧视:来自《国际药品价格指标指南》数据的证据
Int Health. 2013 Mar;5(1):58-63. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihs006. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
The prices people pay for medicines in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦民众购买药品的价格。
Cent Afr J Med. 2009 Jan-Apr;55(1-4):14-9. doi: 10.4314/cajm.v55i1-4.63635.
10
Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries.社区药房的放松管制是否会影响药品可及性、药房服务质量和成本?来自九个欧洲国家的证据。
Health Policy. 2014 Sep;117(3):311-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Jun 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Availability, price and affordability of essential medicines for managing cardiovascular disease in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴治疗心血管疾病基本药物的可及性、价格及可负担性
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82919-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of the increase in the number of community pharmacists on their geographical distribution in Japan: a retrospective survey.日本社区药剂师数量增加对其地理分布的影响:一项回顾性调查
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Dec 8;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00499-9.
2
Determinants of drug prices: a systematic review of comparison studies.药品价格的决定因素:比较研究的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 15;11(7):e046917. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046917.
3
Community pharmacies and pharmacists in Brazil: A missed opportunity.巴西的社区药房和药剂师:一个错失的机遇。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Apr-Jun;19(2):2467. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.2.2467. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
How to address medicines shortages: Findings from a cross-sectional study of 24 countries.如何应对药品短缺:来自 24 个国家的横断面研究结果。
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1287-1296. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.09.001. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
5
Identical or similar brand names used in different countries for medications with different active ingredients: a descriptive analysis.不同国家用于具有不同活性成分的药物的相同或相似商品名:描述性分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec;29(12):988-991. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010316. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
6
Drug shortages as a result of parallel export in Poland - Pharmacists' opinions.波兰平行出口导致的药品短缺——药剂师的观点。
Health Policy. 2020 May;124(5):563-567. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Defining the concept of fair pricing for medicines.界定药品公平定价的概念。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 13;368:l4726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4726.
8
Pricing of pharmaceuticals is becoming a major challenge for health systems.药品定价正成为卫生系统面临的一项重大挑战。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 13;368:l4627. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4627.
9
The Availability, Pricing, and Affordability of Essential Diabetes Medicines in 17 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries.17个低收入、中等收入和高收入国家基本糖尿病药物的可及性、定价与可负担性
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 19;10:1375. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01375. eCollection 2019.
10
Medicine Shortages: Gaps Between Countries and Global Perspectives.药品短缺:国家与全球视角之间的差距。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jul 19;10:763. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00763. eCollection 2019.