Suppr超能文献

缩短小儿超声心动图检查前禁食时间的胃超声评估安全性的对比研究:一项随机对照非劣效性研究。

A comparative study using gastric ultrasound to evaluate the safety of shortening the fasting time before pediatric echocardiography: a randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2024 Aug;38(4):516-524. doi: 10.1007/s00540-024-03360-2. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) in the right lateral decubitus position (RLDP) during a 2-h fasting period is not larger than that during a conventional 4-h fasting period prior to pediatric echocardiography.

METHODS

93 patients aged under 3 years scheduled for echocardiography under sedation were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups; 2-h fasting vs 4-h fasting. For group 4 h (n = 46), the patients were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for more than 4 h, while group 2 h (n = 47) were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for 2 h before echocardiography. Gastric ultrasound was performed before echocardiography, and CSA was measured. We compared CSA incidence of at-risk stomach, fasting duration, and the incidence of major (pulmonary aspiration, aspiration pneumonia) and minor complications (nausea, retching, and vomiting, apnea, and bradycardia) between two groups.

RESULTS

The mean difference of CSA (group 2 h-group 4 h) was 0.49 (- 0.18 to 1.17) cm, and it was within the non-inferiority margin (Δ = 2.1 cm). There was no difference in the incidence of at-risk stomach (P = 0.514). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Two-hour fasting in pediatric patients who need an echocardiography did not increase major and minor complications and CSA significantly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在证明在小儿超声心动图检查前,右侧卧位(RLDP)2 小时禁食期间的胃横截面积(CSA)并不大于传统的 4 小时禁食期间。

方法

本研究纳入了 93 名年龄在 3 岁以下、需镇静下接受超声心动图检查的患者,并将其随机分为两组:2 小时禁食组(n = 47)和 4 小时禁食组(n = 46)。对于 4 小时禁食组,患者被要求禁食超过 4 小时的所有类型的液体,而 2 小时禁食组在接受超声心动图检查前禁食 2 小时。在进行超声心动图检查前,对胃进行超声检查并测量 CSA。我们比较了两组的 CSA 发生率、禁食时间、主要并发症(误吸、吸入性肺炎)和次要并发症(恶心、呕吐、呼吸暂停、心动过缓)的发生率。

结果

CSA 的平均差值(2 小时禁食组-4 小时禁食组)为 0.49(-0.18 至 1.17)cm,在非劣效性边界内(Δ = 2.1 cm)。两组的高危胃发生率无差异(P = 0.514)。两组主要和次要并发症的发生率无显著差异。

结论

在需要超声心动图检查的小儿患者中,2 小时禁食不会显著增加主要和次要并发症及 CSA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验