Suppr超能文献

3D 外显式与显微镜下颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术治疗烟雾病的对比系列研究。

3D exoscopic versus microscopic superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass surgery for moyamoya disease - a comparative series.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jun 7;166(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06100-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) direct bypass surgery is the most common surgical procedure to treat moyamoya disease (MMD). Here, we aim to compare the performance of the 3D exoscope in bypass surgery with the gold standard operative microscope.

METHODS

All direct STA-MCA bypass procedures performed at a single university hospital for MMD between 2015 and 2023 were considered for inclusion. Data were retrospectively collected from patient files and surgical video material. From 2020 onwards, bypass procedures were exclusively performed using a digital three-dimensional exoscope as visualization device. Results were compared with a microsurgical bypass control group (2015-2019). The primary endpoint was defined as total duration of surgery, duration of completing the vascular anastomosis (ischemia time), bypass patency, number of stiches to perform the anastomosis, added stiches after leakage testing of the anastomosis and the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at last follow-up as secondary outcome parameter.

RESULTS

A total of 16 consecutive moyamoya patients underwent 21 STA-MCA bypass procedures. Thereof, six patients were operated using a microscope and ten patients using an exoscope (ORBEYE® n = 1; AEOS® n = 9). Total duration of surgery was comparable between devices (microscope: 313 min. ± 116 vs. exoscope: 279 min. ± 42; p = 0.647). Ischemia time also proved similar between groups (microscope: 43 min. ± 19 vs. exoscope: 41 min. ± 7; p = 0.701). No differences were noted in bypass patency rates. The number of stiches per anastomosis was similar between visualization devices (microscope: 17 ± 4 vs. exoscope: 17 ± 2; p = 0.887). In contrast, more additional stiches were needed in microscopic anastomoses after leakage testing the bypass (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the small sample size, end-to-side bypass surgery for moyamoya disease using a foot switch-operated 3D exoscope was not associated with more complications and led to comparable clinical and radiological results as microscopic bypass surgery.

摘要

目的

颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)直接旁路手术是治疗烟雾病(MMD)最常见的手术方法。在这里,我们旨在比较 3D 手术显微镜在旁路手术中的表现与金标准手术显微镜。

方法

回顾性收集 2015 年至 2023 年期间在一家大学医院因 MMD 进行的所有直接 STA-MCA 旁路手术的数据。从 2020 年开始,旁路手术仅使用数字三维手术显微镜作为可视化设备进行。结果与显微旁路对照组(2015-2019 年)进行比较。主要终点定义为手术总时间、完成血管吻合术的时间(缺血时间)、旁路通畅率、吻合术所需的缝线数量、吻合术渗漏测试后的附加缝线以及最后一次随访时的格拉斯哥结果量表(GOS)作为次要结果参数。

结果

共 16 例连续 MMD 患者接受了 21 例 STA-MCA 旁路手术。其中,6 例患者使用显微镜,10 例患者使用手术显微镜(ORBEYE® n=1;AEOS® n=9)。手术显微镜和手术显微镜之间的手术总时间无差异(显微镜:313 分钟±116 与手术显微镜:279 分钟±42;p=0.647)。两组的缺血时间也相似(显微镜:43 分钟±19 与手术显微镜:41 分钟±7;p=0.701)。旁路通畅率无差异。吻合术的缝线数量在两种可视化设备之间相似(显微镜:17±4 与手术显微镜:17±2;p=0.887)。相比之下,在漏诊旁路后,显微镜吻合术中需要更多的附加缝线(p=0.035)。

结论

考虑到样本量小,使用脚踏开关操作的 3D 手术显微镜进行端侧旁路手术治疗烟雾病并不会增加并发症,并导致与显微镜旁路手术相当的临床和影像学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd4e/11161429/f88442d254b0/701_2024_6100_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验