Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuESt) (152), Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC), Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3965-3972. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07554-w. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
To identify challenges and pragmatic strategies for improving diagnostic safety at an organizational level using concepts from learning health systems METHODS: We interviewed 32 safety leaders across the USA on how their organizations approach diagnostic safety. Participants were recruited through email and represented geographically diverse academic and non-academic settings. The interview included questions on culture of reporting and learning from diagnostic errors; data gathering and analysis activities; diagnostic training and educational activities; and engagement of clinical leadership, staff, patients, and families in diagnostic safety activities. We conducted an inductive content analysis of interview transcripts and two reviewers coded all data.
Of 32 participants, 12 reported having a specific program to address diagnostic errors. Multiple barriers to implement diagnostic safety activities emerged: serious concerns about psychological safety associated with diagnostic error; lack of infrastructure for measurement, monitoring, and improvement activities related to diagnosis; lack of leadership investment, which was often diverted to competing priorities related to publicly reported measures or other incentives; and lack of dedicated teams to work on diagnostic safety. Participants provided several strategies to overcome barriers including adapting trigger tools to identify safety events, engaging patients in diagnostic safety, and appointing dedicated diagnostic safety champions.
Several foundational building blocks related to learning health systems could inform organizational efforts to reduce diagnostic error. Promoting an organizational culture specific to diagnostic safety, using science and informatics to improve measurement and analysis, leadership incentives to build institutional capacity to address diagnostic errors, and patient engagement in diagnostic safety activities can enable progress.
利用学习型健康系统的概念,确定在组织层面提高诊断安全性的挑战和务实策略。
我们对美国各地的 32 名安全负责人进行了访谈,了解他们的组织如何处理诊断安全问题。参与者通过电子邮件招募,代表了不同地理位置的学术和非学术环境。访谈包括关于报告和从诊断错误中学习的文化、数据收集和分析活动、诊断培训和教育活动,以及临床领导、员工、患者和家属在诊断安全活动中的参与情况。我们对访谈记录进行了归纳内容分析,两位审阅者对所有数据进行了编码。
在 32 名参与者中,有 12 名报告说有专门的计划来解决诊断错误问题。实施诊断安全活动存在多个障碍:与诊断错误相关的严重心理安全问题;缺乏与诊断相关的测量、监测和改进活动的基础设施;领导层投资不足,往往被转移到与公开报告的措施或其他激励措施相关的竞争优先事项上;缺乏专门的团队来从事诊断安全工作。参与者提供了一些克服障碍的策略,包括调整触发工具以识别安全事件、让患者参与诊断安全,以及任命专门的诊断安全冠军。
与学习型健康系统相关的几个基础要素可以为组织减少诊断错误的努力提供信息。促进特定于诊断安全的组织文化,利用科学和信息学来改善测量和分析,领导激励措施来建立解决诊断错误的机构能力,以及患者参与诊断安全活动,可以推动进展。