Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo, Central Jakarta, Indonesia.
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Jun 8;11(1):e001163. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001163.
Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.
This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.
We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001).
Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.
神经精神性狼疮(NPSLE)具有广泛的表现,迄今为止,尚无金标准生物标志物。该疾病的诊断依赖于临床评估、支持性检查以及排除其他可能的病因。一种可以用于建立 NPSLE 的方法是通过涉及多个医学领域进行重新评估。本研究旨在通过多学科重新评估来重新评估有神经精神(NP)表现的狼疮病例,并确定 NPSLE 或非 NPSLE 的最终诊断。
这是一项回顾性的横断面研究,使用了有 NP 表现的狼疮患者的病历数据。纳入标准包括诊断为狼疮、有 NP 临床表现且年龄>18 岁的患者。进行多学科重新评估,并就 NPSLE 或非 NPSLE 的诊断达成一致。
我们纳入了 94 例共 132 例 NP 事件的患者,其中包括 69 例 NPSLE 和 63 例非 NPSLE。重新评估 NPSLE 事件后,仍有 33.3%被诊断为 NPSLE。同时,在非 NPSLE 组中,有 22.2%被重新诊断为 NPSLE。NPSLE 组和非 NPSLE 组之间的人口统计学特征没有显著差异。两组的 NP 事件比例几乎相同,但脑血管疾病表现更常见于 NPSLE 组。与非 NPSLE 组相比,NPSLE 组的墨西哥狼疮疾病活动指数评分较高(有 NP 时 p<0.001,无 NP 时 p=0.02),且疾病活动比例较高(p=0.03),抗双链 DNA 滴度较高(p<0.001),C3 值较低(p=0.018),C4 值较低(p=0.001)。
多学科重新评估可作为一种方法来确认 NPSLE 的诊断。当临床医生面对狼疮患者的 NP 事件时,存在过度诊断 NPSLE 的趋势。需要完整的临床和支持性数据来确定 NPSLE 的最终诊断。