Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 8;14(6):e077637. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077637.
We sought to understand the influence of recurrent assessments on the behaviour of children and caregivers in a 2-year study of an agricultural livelihood intervention.
This study used qualitative exit interviews from caregivers in the control arm of a large, cluster-randomised control trial, Shamba Maisha.
The study was conducted in Western Kenya and involved 12 health facilities between 2016 and 2019.
Participants were 99 caregivers in the control arm who had a child that was 6-36 months in age at the start of the study.
Intervention participants within Shamba Maisha received an irrigation pump, farming lessons and a microloan. Control participants received no intervention but were offered the intervention after completing the 2-year study.
Despite receiving no formal benefits, control caregivers reported improved mental health and enhanced knowledge of their child's health compared with the beginning of the study and reported changes in the child's play and diet that they attributed to participation in study assessments. Caregivers in the control arm attributed their changed behaviour to recurrent questioning, instrumental support, interactions with study staff and increased health knowledge.
Recurrent assessments altered participant behaviour, which may have made inference of the intervention's impact more difficult. In designing future, such studies with intervention and control arms, a trade-off between the gains in statistical power provided by recurrent visits and the avoidance of alterations in participants' behaviour that could affect responses to assessments must be considered when deciding on the number of visits for assessment.
NCT03170986; NCT02815579.
我们旨在了解在一项为期两年的农业生计干预研究中,反复评估对儿童和照顾者行为的影响。
本研究使用了来自大型群组随机对照试验“Shamba Maisha”对照组中照顾者的定性退出访谈。
该研究在肯尼亚西部进行,涉及 2016 年至 2019 年期间的 12 个卫生设施。
参与者为对照组中 99 名年龄在 6-36 个月的儿童的照顾者。
Shamba Maisha 中的干预参与者获得了灌溉泵、农业课程和小额贷款。对照组参与者未接受干预,但在完成两年研究后可获得该干预。
尽管对照组照顾者没有获得正式的收益,但与研究开始时相比,他们报告称心理健康状况有所改善,对子女健康的了解有所增强,并且报告称子女的游戏和饮食发生了变化,他们将这些变化归因于参与研究评估。对照组的照顾者将他们的行为变化归因于反复询问、工具支持、与研究人员的互动以及健康知识的增加。
反复评估改变了参与者的行为,这可能使干预影响的推断更加困难。在设计未来具有干预和对照组的此类研究时,在决定评估次数时,必须权衡反复访问提供的统计能力的提高与避免改变参与者的行为之间的利弊,这些行为可能会影响对评估的反应。
NCT03170986;NCT02815579。