历史邻里红线和旁观者心肺复苏术在院外心脏骤停中的差异。
Historical neighborhood redlining and bystander CPR disparities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
机构信息
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States; Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
出版信息
Resuscitation. 2024 Aug;201:110264. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110264. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
BACKGROUND
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with low survival rates. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for improving outcomes, but its utilization remains limited, particularly among racial and ethnic minorities. Historical redlining, a practice that classified neighborhoods for mortgage risk in 1930s, may have lasting implications for social and health outcomes. This study sought to investigate the influence of redlining on the provision of bystander CPR during witnessed OHCA.
METHODS
We conducted an analysis using data from the comprehensive Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES), encompassing 736,066 non-traumatic OHCA cases across the United States. The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) map shapefiles were utilized to categorize census tracts of arrests into four grades (A signifying "best", B "still desirable", C "declining", and D "hazardous"). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models were employed to predict the likelihood of CPR provision, adjusting for various factors including age, sex, race/ethnicity, arrest location, calendar year, and state of occurrence. Additionally, we accounted for the percentage of Black residents and residents below poverty levels at the census tract level.
RESULTS
Among the 43,186 witnessed cases of OHCA in graded HOLC census tracts, 37.2% received bystander CPR. The rates of bystander CPR exhibited a gradual decline across HOLC grades, ranging from 41.8% in HOLC grade A to 35.8% in HOLC grade D. In fully adjusted model, we observed significantly lower odds of receiving bystander CPR in HOLC grades C (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98, p = 0.016) and D (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.95, p = 0.002) compared to HOLC grade A.
CONCLUSION
Redlining, a historical segregation practice, is associated with reduced contemporary rates of bystander CPR during OHCA. Targeted CPR training in redlined neighborhoods may be imperative to enhance survival outcomes.
背景
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的存活率较低。旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)对于改善预后至关重要,但利用率仍然有限,尤其是在少数族裔中。历史上的红线划分(redlining)是 20 世纪 30 年代对抵押贷款风险进行分类的一种做法,可能对社会和健康结果产生持久的影响。本研究旨在调查红线划分对目击 OHCA 期间旁观者提供 CPR 的影响。
方法
我们使用美国综合心脏骤停登记处以提高生存率(CARES)的数据进行了分析,该数据涵盖了美国 736,066 例非创伤性 OHCA 病例。利用房主贷款公司(HOLC)地图形状文件将逮捕的普查区分为四个等级(A 表示“最佳”,B 表示“仍然理想”,C 表示“下降”,D 表示“危险”)。使用多变量分层逻辑回归模型预测 CPR 提供的可能性,调整了年龄、性别、种族/民族、逮捕地点、日历年度和发生地点等各种因素。此外,我们还考虑了普查区的黑人居民和贫困线以下居民的百分比。
结果
在分级 HOLC 普查区的 43,186 例目击 OHCA 病例中,有 37.2%接受了旁观者 CPR。旁观者 CPR 的比率随着 HOLC 等级的降低而逐渐降低,从 HOLC 等级 A 的 41.8%降至 HOLC 等级 D 的 35.8%。在完全调整的模型中,我们观察到在 HOLC 等级 C(OR 0.89,95%CI 0.81-0.98,p=0.016)和 D(OR 0.86,95%CI 0.78-0.95,p=0.002)中接受旁观者 CPR 的可能性明显降低,与 HOLC 等级 A 相比。
结论
红线划分是一种历史上的隔离做法,与 OHCA 期间旁观者 CPR 率降低有关。在红线划分的社区中进行有针对性的 CPR 培训可能对提高生存结果至关重要。