Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Medicine, Kirsehir.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep;105(9):1657-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.023. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of I-tape and button hole kinesio taping (KT) techniques added to exercises in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled blinded study. SETTING: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 patients (165 wrists) diagnosed with CTS (N=108). INTERVENTIONS: Button hole technique (BG), I-band technique (IG), and exercises (EG). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual analog scale (VAS), Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questions (DN4), Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire, and Jamar dynamometer were used. Median sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), median distal sensory latency (DSL), median distal motor latency (DML), sensory conduction velocity, and motor conduction velocity were recorded. Measurements were made at baseline, week 3, and week 12. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were in each group. Significant statistical improvements in VAS and DN4 scores were found in the BG and IG compared with EG (P<.05). Statistically significant improvements in hand grip strength were observed in the IG compared with the EG (P<.05). Significant improvements in DML levels and motor conduction velocity were observed in the BG and IG compared with the EG (P<.05). A significant increase in sensory conduction velocity was detected in the BG compared with the other groups (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both KT techniques are effective in terms of pain, functionality, symptom severity, grip strength, and electrophysiologically. The button hole technique was more effective in DSL, sensory conduction velocity, CMAP amplitude, and SNAP.
目的:比较 I 型贴布和纽扣孔贴布(KT)技术联合运动疗法治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的疗效。 设计:前瞻性随机对照双盲研究。 设置:物理医学与康复门诊。 参与者:共 108 例(165 只腕)被诊断为 CTS 的患者(N=108)。 干预:纽扣孔技术(BG)、I 型带技术(IG)和运动疗法(EG)。 主要观察指标:视觉模拟评分(VAS)、神经病理性疼痛 4 问量表(DN4)、波士顿腕管综合征问卷和 Jamar 握力计。记录正中神经感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)、复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)、正中神经远端感觉潜伏期(DSL)、正中神经远端运动潜伏期(DML)、感觉传导速度和运动传导速度。在基线、第 3 周和第 12 周进行测量。 结果:每组 36 例患者。与 EG 相比,BG 和 IG 组的 VAS 和 DN4 评分均有显著统计学改善(P<.05)。IG 组的手握力与 EG 相比有显著统计学改善(P<.05)。BG 和 IG 组与 EG 相比,DML 水平和运动传导速度有显著改善(P<.05)。与其他组相比,BG 组的感觉传导速度有显著增加(P<.05)。 结论:两种 KT 技术在疼痛、功能、症状严重程度、握力和电生理方面均有效。纽扣孔技术在 DSL、感觉传导速度、CMAP 幅度和 SNAP 方面更有效。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017-5