• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南亚的癌症研究资金。

Cancer research funding in South Asia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Policy. 2024 Sep;41:100489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100489. Epub 2024 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100489
PMID:38851630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11398951/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rising burden of cancer significantly influences the global economy and healthcare systems. While local and contextual cancer research is crucial, it is often limited by the availability of funds. In South Asia, with 1.7 million new cancer cases and 1.1 million deaths due to cancer in 2020, understanding cancer research funding trends is pivotal.

METHODS

We reviewed funded cancer studies conducted between January 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2022, using ClinicalTrials.gov, International Cancer Research Partnership (ICRP) Database, NIH World RePORT, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We included funded studies related to all cancer types, conducted in South Asian countries, namely Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

RESULTS

We identified 6561 funded cancer studies from South Asia between 2003 and 2022, increasing from 400 studies in 2003-2007 to 3909 studies in 2018-2022. India had the highest number of funded cancer studies, while Afghanistan, Bhutan, and the Maldives had minimal or no funded cancer research output. Interventional studies (67.3%) were the most common study type funded. The most common cancer sites funded were breast (17.8%), lung (9.9%), oropharyngeal (6.2%), and cervical (5.0%) cancers. On the WHO ICTRP, international funding agencies contributed to a majority of studies (57.5%), except in India where local funding agencies (58.2%) funded more studies.

CONCLUSION

This study identified gaps in research funding distribution across cancer types and geographic areas in South Asia. This data can be used to optimize the distribution of cancer research funding in South Asia, fostering equitable advancement in cancer research.

摘要

背景

癌症负担的不断增加对全球经济和医疗体系产生了重大影响。虽然地方和具体的癌症研究至关重要,但往往受到资金可用性的限制。在南亚,2020 年有 170 万例新癌症病例和 110 万例癌症死亡病例,了解癌症研究资金趋势至关重要。

方法

我们使用 ClinicalTrials.gov、国际癌症研究伙伴关系 (ICRP) 数据库、NIH 世界报告和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台 (ICTRP) 审查了 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间开展的癌症资助研究。我们纳入了在南亚国家(阿富汗、孟加拉国、不丹、印度、马尔代夫、尼泊尔、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡)开展的所有癌症类型的资助研究。

结果

我们发现 2003 年至 2022 年期间,南亚有 6561 项癌症资助研究,从 2003 年至 2007 年的 400 项研究增加到 2018 年至 2022 年的 3909 项研究。印度拥有最多的癌症资助研究,而阿富汗、不丹和马尔代夫的癌症资助研究产出极少或没有。干预性研究(67.3%)是最常见的资助研究类型。最常见的资助癌症部位是乳腺癌(17.8%)、肺癌(9.9%)、口咽癌(6.2%)和宫颈癌(5.0%)。在世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台上,国际资助机构对大多数研究(57.5%)做出了贡献,而在印度,本地资助机构(58.2%)资助了更多的研究。

结论

本研究发现了南亚癌症类型和地理区域研究资金分配的差距。这些数据可用于优化南亚癌症研究资金的分配,促进癌症研究的公平发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/daa45da09ffd/nihms-2003602-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/1aa7dca36287/nihms-2003602-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/3ce8c8cedbe8/nihms-2003602-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/ce586b3a2e2b/nihms-2003602-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/603c5a57d6c3/nihms-2003602-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/daa45da09ffd/nihms-2003602-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/1aa7dca36287/nihms-2003602-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/3ce8c8cedbe8/nihms-2003602-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/ce586b3a2e2b/nihms-2003602-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/603c5a57d6c3/nihms-2003602-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a0/11398951/daa45da09ffd/nihms-2003602-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer research funding in South Asia.南亚的癌症研究资金。
J Cancer Policy. 2024 Sep;41:100489. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100489. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Cancer Research Funding in Africa.非洲的癌症研究资金
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 7;5(1):278. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00992-7.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 22;2015(12):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub2.
5
Quantification of regional variation in ultra-processed food consumption and its sociodemographic correlates across Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka: insights from the South Asia Biobank.孟加拉国、印度、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡超加工食品消费的区域差异及其社会人口学相关因素的量化:来自南亚生物银行的见解。
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2025 Jul 18;39:100633. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2025.100633. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Autism Spectrum disorders (ASD) in South Asia: a systematic review.南亚的自闭症谱系障碍:一项系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1440-x.
7
A systematic review of air pollution as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in South Asia: limited evidence from India and Pakistan.南亚地区空气污染作为心血管疾病风险因素的系统评价:来自印度和巴基斯坦的有限证据。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2014 Mar;217(2-3):133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
8
Integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) strategy for children under five.五岁以下儿童疾病综合管理(IMCI)策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 22;2016(6):CD010123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010123.pub2.
9
Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.用于青光眼的设备改良小梁切除术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub2.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer Research Funding in Africa.非洲的癌症研究资金
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jul 7;5(1):278. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00992-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Health research mentorship in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.健康研究指导在中低收入国家:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Oct 1;21(10):1912-1970. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00260.
2
Cancer research funding data to drive collaboration and inform action.癌症研究资助数据推动合作并为行动提供信息。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jun;24(6):584-586. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00153-5.
3
Cancer research in Pakistan: Opportunities, challenges and the way forward.巴基斯坦的癌症研究:机遇、挑战与未来发展方向。
J Cancer Policy. 2022 Dec;34:100358. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2022.100358. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
4
The Burden of Cancer, Government Strategic Policies, and Challenges in Pakistan: A Comprehensive Review.巴基斯坦的癌症负担、政府战略政策与挑战:全面综述
Front Nutr. 2022 Jul 22;9:940514. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.940514. eCollection 2022.
5
Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice.促进早期职业研究者赋权以改善研究文化和实践的建议。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jul 7;20(7):e3001680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001680. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Health research funding and its output in Pakistan.巴基斯坦的卫生研究经费及其产出。
East Mediterr Health J. 2021 Sep 21;27(9):906-910. doi: 10.26719/emhj.21.038.
7
Disentangling Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Treatment for Colorectal Cancer.解析结直肠癌治疗中的种族、民族和社会经济差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Aug;30(8):1546-1553. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1728. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
8
Cancer services in Sri Lanka: current status and future directions.斯里兰卡的癌症服务:现状与未来方向。
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2021 Jun 3;33(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43046-021-00070-8.
9
Trends in International Cancer Research Investment 2006-2018.2006-2018 年国际癌症研究投资趋势。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Apr;7:602-610. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00591.
10
Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment.评估癌症研究的影响:现有研究影响评估方法综述的经验教训与实例
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 11;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00658-x.