Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02590-x.
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. METHODS: The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.
背景:超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞常用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疼痛控制。然而,手术后当天仍存在明显疼痛,影响患者的恢复和睡眠质量。我们比较了超声引导下 TAP 阻滞联合或不联合腹直肌鞘(RS)阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的镇痛效果,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。
方法:该研究在患者入组前于临床研究信息服务处(注册号:KCT0006468,2021 年 8 月 19 日)进行了注册。88 例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I-III 级的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者分为两组。RS-TAP 组接受右侧外侧和右侧肋缘下 TAP 阻滞,以及 0.2%罗哌卡因(30 mL)的 RS 阻滞;Bi-TAP 组接受双侧和右侧肋缘下 TAP 阻滞,用同样剂量的罗哌卡因。主要结局是术后 48 小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要结局包括使用解救性镇痛药、累积静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)消耗、患者满意度、睡眠质量和不良事件发生率。
结果:两组患者术后 48 小时 VAS 评分无显著差异。我们发现两组在任何次要结局方面均无差异:解救性镇痛药的使用、IV-PCA 的消耗、患者对术后疼痛控制的满意度、睡眠质量和术后不良事件的发生率。
结论:RS-TAP 和 Bi-TAP 阻滞均能为腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者提供临床可接受的疼痛控制,但两种联合阻滞在术后镇痛或睡眠质量方面无显著差异。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018
J Biomed Res. 2019-8-29