文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合或不联合腹直肌鞘阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者镇痛效果的随机对照研究。

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with or without rectus sheath block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.

Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 8;24(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02590-x.


DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02590-x
PMID:38851689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11162032/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores. METHODS: The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. CONCLUSION: Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.

摘要

背景:超声引导下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞常用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疼痛控制。然而,手术后当天仍存在明显疼痛,影响患者的恢复和睡眠质量。我们比较了超声引导下 TAP 阻滞联合或不联合腹直肌鞘(RS)阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的镇痛效果,采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。

方法:该研究在患者入组前于临床研究信息服务处(注册号:KCT0006468,2021 年 8 月 19 日)进行了注册。88 例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 I-III 级的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者分为两组。RS-TAP 组接受右侧外侧和右侧肋缘下 TAP 阻滞,以及 0.2%罗哌卡因(30 mL)的 RS 阻滞;Bi-TAP 组接受双侧和右侧肋缘下 TAP 阻滞,用同样剂量的罗哌卡因。主要结局是术后 48 小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要结局包括使用解救性镇痛药、累积静脉患者自控镇痛(IV-PCA)消耗、患者满意度、睡眠质量和不良事件发生率。

结果:两组患者术后 48 小时 VAS 评分无显著差异。我们发现两组在任何次要结局方面均无差异:解救性镇痛药的使用、IV-PCA 的消耗、患者对术后疼痛控制的满意度、睡眠质量和术后不良事件的发生率。

结论:RS-TAP 和 Bi-TAP 阻滞均能为腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者提供临床可接受的疼痛控制,但两种联合阻滞在术后镇痛或睡眠质量方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6840/11162032/32e932980230/12871_2024_2590_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6840/11162032/b9cd1edbcfc8/12871_2024_2590_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6840/11162032/32e932980230/12871_2024_2590_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6840/11162032/b9cd1edbcfc8/12871_2024_2590_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6840/11162032/32e932980230/12871_2024_2590_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with or without rectus sheath block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024-6-8

[2]
Postoperative analgesic efficacy of single-shot and continuous transversus abdominis plane block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

J Clin Anesth. 2017-4-8

[3]
A Comparison of effect of preemptive versus postoperative use of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Sci Rep. 2022-1-12

[4]
Transversus abdominis plane block as a component of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J Clin Anesth. 2016-11

[5]
The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy.

Anesth Analg. 2013-6-6

[6]
Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block with Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2019-1-28

[7]
Comparison of posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J Clin Anesth. 2014-6

[8]
Analgesic efficacy of postoperative bilateral, ultrasound-guided, posterior transversus abdominis plane block for laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized, prospective, controlled study.

BMC Anesthesiol. 2021-4-6

[9]
Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus No TAP block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy; a randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Int J Surg. 2022-5

[10]
Analgesic Effect Of Bilateral Subcostal Tap Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018

引用本文的文献

[1]
Esketamine as an Epidural Adjuvant for Postoperative Analgesia in Gynecological Malignancy Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

J Pain Res. 2025-8-23

本文引用的文献

[1]
Cutaneous sensory block area of the ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: an observational study.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024-4-2

[2]
Complications and Technical Consideration of Ultrasound-Guided Rectus Sheath Blocks: A Retrospective Analysis of 4033 Patients.

Anesth Analg. 2023-2-1

[3]
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Strategy for Effective Pain Management in Patients with Pain during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review.

J Clin Med. 2022-11-22

[4]
Postoperative sleep disorders and their potential impacts on surgical outcomes.

J Biomed Res. 2019-8-29

[5]
Laparoscopic Single-Port Versus Traditional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

JSLS. 2019

[6]
Analgesic effectiveness of rectus sheath block during open gastrectomy: A prospective double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-4

[7]
Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthetics in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin J Pain. 2019-4

[8]
Evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update.

Br J Anaesth. 2018-8-7

[9]
Comparison of ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration with bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Indian J Anaesth. 2018-7

[10]
Pharmacokinetics of levobupivacaine with epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after Caesarean section.

Br J Anaesth. 2018-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索