超声引导下双侧肋下腹横肌平面阻滞与布比卡因切口浸润在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的比较
Comparison of ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration with bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
作者信息
Suseela Indu, Anandan Krishnadas, Aravind Arun, Kaniyil Suvarna
机构信息
Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
出版信息
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;62(7):497-501. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_55_18.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Many patients experience moderate-to-severe pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with port-site infiltration for post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS
Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were divided into two groups of 40 each to receive ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal TAP block (T) with 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml each side or port-site infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine 5 ml each at 4 ports (I) at the end of the surgery before extubation. All patients received paracetamol 1 g intravenous 8 hourly. Tramadol 1 mg/kg intravenous bolus and diclofenac 1 mg/kg intravenous infusion were used as the first- and second-line rescue analgesics when Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4, or when the patient complained of pain. NRS at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after surgery, time to first analgesic request and total dose of analgesics in 24 h were recorded. Chi-square test and independent -test were used to compare qualitative and quantitative data, respectively.
RESULTS
Time to first analgesic (mean±SD) in Group I and Group T was 292.7 ± 67.03 and 510.3 ± 154.55 min and mean tramadol required was141.8 ± 60.01 mg and 48.69 ± 36.14 mg, respectively ( = 0.001 for both). Mean NRS at 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 h was significantly lower in Group T.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal TAP block provides superior post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to port-site infiltration.
背景与目的
许多患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后会经历中度至重度疼痛。我们旨在比较超声引导下双侧肋下腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与切口部位浸润用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的效果。
方法
接受全身麻醉下择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被分为两组,每组40例,在手术结束拔管前,一组接受超声引导下双侧肋下TAP阻滞(T组),每侧注射20 ml 0.25%布比卡因,另一组接受在4个切口部位各注射5 ml 0.5%布比卡因的切口部位浸润(I组)。所有患者每8小时静脉注射1 g对乙酰氨基酚。当数字评分量表(NRS)≥4或患者主诉疼痛时,静脉注射1 mg/kg曲马多推注和1 mg/kg双氯芬酸静脉输注作为一线和二线解救镇痛药。记录术后1、2、3、6、12和24小时的NRS、首次镇痛需求时间和24小时内镇痛药的总剂量。分别采用卡方检验和独立样本t检验比较定性和定量数据。
结果
I组和T组的首次镇痛时间(均值±标准差)分别为292.7±67.03分钟和510.3±154.55分钟,所需曲马多的均值分别为141.8±60.01 mg和48.69±36.14 mg(两者均P = 0.001)。T组在术后2、3、6、12和24小时的平均NRS显著更低。
结论
与切口部位浸润相比,超声引导下双侧肋下TAP阻滞在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后提供了更好的术后镇痛效果。
相似文献
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018
引用本文的文献
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023-11
本文引用的文献
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-7-31
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012-7
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010-4-28