Research Unit VEG-i-TEC, Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Campus Kortrijk, Sint-Martens-Latemlaan 2B, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
Research Unit Food Microbiology and Food Preservation (FMFP), Department of Food Technology, Safety and Health, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2024 Aug 16;421:110779. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2024.110779. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
Airborne microorganisms in food processing environments pose a potential risk for food product contamination. Yet, the absence of established standards or guidelines setting quantitative limits on airborne microorganisms underscores a critical gap in current regulatory frameworks. This review seeks to explore the feasibility of establishing quantitative limits for airborne microorganisms in food processing facilities, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance to enhance food safety practices in the industry. The review begins by addressing the complexities of microbial air quality in the food industry through a general literature search covering sources of airborne microorganisms, factors affecting particle deposition, air sampling methods and preventive measures. Subsequently, it employs a structured approach to assess the significance of air quality and its impact on product quality. Utilizing the PRISMA method, relevant scientific literature from May 2002 to May 2022 was examined, resulting in 26 articles meeting inclusion criteria from a pool of 11,737 original research papers. Additionally, the review investigates existing probability models for assessing airborne contamination to enhance air quality risk assessment in food safety management systems. The literature reveals a lack of substantial evidence supporting a direct correlation between airborne microorganisms and food contamination. The absence of standardized air sampling methodologies in previous studies hinders the comparability and reliability of research findings. Additionally, the literature fails to establish a conclusive relationship between influencing factors such as total particle counts, temperature, relative humidity and airborne contamination. Contradictory probability models for quantifying airborne contamination, and the absence of tailored preventive measures, hinder effective control and undermine microbial contamination control in diverse food processing contexts. In conclusion, the development of numeric guidelines for airborne contamination necessitates a tailored approach, considering factors such as product characteristics and production context. By integrating risk assessment models into this process, a more thorough comprehension of contamination risks can be achieved, providing tailored guidance based on the identified risk levels for each product. Ongoing collaborative efforts are essential to develop evidence-based guidelines that effectively mitigate risks without incurring unnecessary costs.
食品加工环境中的空气传播微生物对食品产品污染构成潜在风险。然而,目前的监管框架中缺乏设定空气传播微生物定量限值的既定标准或准则,这突显了一个关键的空白。本综述旨在探讨在食品加工设施中为空气传播微生物设定定量限值的可行性,旨在为加强行业食品安全实践提供基于证据的指导。综述首先通过涵盖空气传播微生物来源、影响颗粒沉积的因素、空气采样方法和预防措施的一般文献搜索,解决食品工业中微生物空气质量的复杂性。随后,它采用结构化方法评估空气质量的重要性及其对产品质量的影响。利用 PRISMA 方法,对 2002 年 5 月至 2022 年 5 月的相关科学文献进行了检查,从 11737 篇原始研究论文中筛选出符合纳入标准的 26 篇文章。此外,该综述还调查了现有的评估空气传播污染的概率模型,以增强食品安全管理系统中空气质量管理风险评估。文献表明,没有充分的证据支持空气传播微生物与食品污染之间存在直接相关性。先前研究中缺乏标准化的空气采样方法学,阻碍了研究结果的可比性和可靠性。此外,文献也未能确定总颗粒计数、温度、相对湿度和空气传播污染等影响因素之间的明确关系。用于量化空气传播污染的概率模型存在差异,以及缺乏针对性的预防措施,阻碍了在不同食品加工环境中进行有效的控制和微生物污染控制。总之,为空气传播污染制定数值指南需要采取量身定制的方法,考虑产品特性和生产环境等因素。通过将风险评估模型纳入这一过程,可以更全面地了解污染风险,并根据每个产品确定的风险水平提供针对性的指导。开展协作努力至关重要,以制定基于证据的指南,在不增加不必要成本的情况下有效降低风险。