Brenn B Randall, Disilvio Gregory M, Yarnall Evan, Steindler Jessica, Tarazi Suhail, Rompala Alexander, Akhnoukh Kyrillos, Choudhry Dinesh K
Anesthesiology, Shriners Children's-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
Anesthesiology/Pediatric Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.
Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59723. eCollection 2024 May.
Vertebral body tethering (VBT) requires a thoracoscopic approach to visualize the vertebral bodies. Lung collapse and re-expansion have the potential to cause acute lung injury, resulting in increased oxygen and ventilation requirements.
We compared the intraoperative ventilator management, intra- and postoperative blood gas determinations, and hospital stay information between adolescents undergoing unilateral versus bilateral lung isolation for vertebral body tethering.
A study cohort of 132 propensity-matched cases (66 unilateral and 66 bilateral) was derived from 351 consecutive VBT cases. Patient demographic information, case information, fluid administration, ventilatory settings data, blood gas parameters, and complete blood count and differential data were entered into a datasheet. Derived parameters included values calculated from the alveolar gas equation to develop an oxygen cascade and measures of inflammatory response. Chi-square was used for categorical data, and independent samples and tests were used for continuous data.
The double lung isolation group required higher peak inspiratory pressures (SL 29±5 vs. DL 31±5, =0.026), resulting in higher tidal volume (SL 246±63 vs. DL 334±101, <0.001) and tidal volume per kg (SL 5.6±1.4 vs. DL 6.9±2, <0.001) as compared to the single lung group. The double lung group required a higher partial pressure of inspired and alveolar oxygen as well as a higher alveolar to arterial oxygen tension gradient (SL 417±126 vs. DL 485±96, =0.001) to achieve optimal arterial oxygen tension. Patients with double lung isolation had similar intensive care lengths of stay but a longer hospital stay than single lung isolation patients.
Patients undergoing double lung isolation required greater ventilatory support and had more evidence of acute lung injury, as evidenced by a higher postoperative alveolar to arterial oxygen gradient; however, these healthy adolescents tolerated the procedure well and only differed in the hospital length of stay by a day.
椎体牵张术(VBT)需要采用胸腔镜方法来观察椎体。肺萎陷和复张有可能导致急性肺损伤,从而增加氧气需求和通气需求。
我们比较了接受单侧与双侧肺隔离进行椎体牵张术的青少年患者在术中呼吸机管理、术中和术后血气测定以及住院时间方面的情况。
从351例连续的VBT病例中选取了132例倾向匹配病例(66例单侧和66例双侧)组成研究队列。将患者人口统计学信息、病例信息、液体输注、通气设置数据、血气参数以及全血细胞计数和分类数据录入数据表。推导参数包括根据肺泡气体方程计算得出的值,以建立氧梯度和炎症反应指标。分类数据采用卡方检验,连续数据采用独立样本检验。
与单肺组相比,双肺隔离组需要更高的吸气峰压(单肺组29±5与双肺组31±5,P = 0.026),导致潮气量更高(单肺组246±63与双肺组334±101,P<0.001)以及每千克体重潮气量更高(单肺组5.6±1.4与双肺组6.9±2,P<0.001)。双肺组需要更高的吸入氧分压和肺泡氧分压以及更高的肺泡 - 动脉氧分压差(单肺组417±126与双肺组485±96,P = 0.001)以达到最佳动脉氧分压。双肺隔离患者的重症监护住院时间相似,但住院时间比单肺隔离患者长。
接受双肺隔离的患者需要更大的通气支持,并且有更多急性肺损伤的证据,术后肺泡 - 动脉氧梯度更高表明了这一点;然而,这些健康的青少年对该手术耐受性良好,仅住院时间相差一天。