Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, USA.
Division of Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Spine Deform. 2021 Nov;9(6):1581-1589. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00364-w. Epub 2021 May 18.
Estimated blood loss (EBL), anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay decreased over 67 navigated vertebral body tethering (VBT) surgeries performed in a 5-year period, indicating a steep learning curve.
Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
There would be a significant improvement in the performance of VBT procedures over time at a single tertiary center in terms of perioperative and postoperative outcomes.
Learning a new procedure for surgeons takes time, and previous studies have described improved efficiency as experience grows. VBT procedures are increasingly being performed in the US, but there is limited data regarding the learning curve specifically regarding the use of CT-guided navigation. We sought to assess the learning curve of VBT with respect to estimated blood loss, anesthesia time, operative time, length of stay, percent correction of the major curve at first follow-up. We further sought to characterize change in rates of 90-day complications.
Pediatric scoliosis patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar CT-guided navigated VBT with a consistent surgical team at a single tertiary referral center between 2015 and 2020 were included. Student t-test was used to assess change in perioperative parameters over time, and also results between first and latest group of 20 patients were compared.
67 patients met inclusion criteria. Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, anesthesia time and length of stay significantly decreased over the 5-year study period. Specifically, on comparison of our first 20 patients with our last 20, the former had greater EBL (282 vs 116 ml, p = 0.0005; 8.5% vs 3.6%, p = 0.0024), operative time (4.8 h vs. 3.3 h, p < 0.001), anesthesia time (7.4 h vs. 5.7 h, p = 0.0001), and length of stay (3.7 days vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.019). We also found significant reduction in EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and LOS in patients who underwent VBT surgery after 2019. There was no significant change in the percent correction of the major Cobb angle at first erect imaging or 90-day complications over the 5-year study period or between the various cohorts.
This series has demonstrated improvements in surgical efficiency for VBT including reduced EBL, operative time, anesthesia time and hospital stay over a 5-year period. This indicates improved surgical technique and outlines the significant learning curve for surgeons who wish to perform this procedure. Improved surgeon training programs and newer instrumentation may reduce this learning curve.
67 cases in a 5-year period, VBT procedures performed at a single center had significantly decreased EBL, anesthesia time, operative time, and length of stay, indicating a steep learning curve.
在一个 5 年的时间里,67 例导航椎体牵引术(VBT)的术中出血量(EBL)、麻醉时间、手术时间和住院时间都有所减少,表明存在陡峭的学习曲线。
前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。
在一家三级转诊中心,VBT 手术的围手术期和术后结果随着时间的推移会有显著改善。
学习一项新的手术对外科医生来说需要时间,以前的研究表明,随着经验的增加,效率会提高。VBT 手术在美国的应用越来越广泛,但关于学习曲线的具体数据,特别是关于 CT 引导导航的使用,还很有限。我们评估 VBT 的学习曲线,涉及术中出血量、麻醉时间、手术时间、住院时间、初次随访时主曲线的矫正百分比。我们还试图描述 90 天并发症发生率的变化。
在 2015 年至 2020 年间,在一家三级转诊中心,由同一支外科医生团队对接受胸腰椎 CT 引导导航 VBT 的儿科脊柱侧弯患者进行了研究。采用学生 t 检验评估手术参数随时间的变化,并比较了前 20 例患者和最近的 20 例患者之间的结果。
67 例患者符合纳入标准。EBL、手术时间、麻醉时间和住院时间在 5 年的研究期间显著减少。具体来说,在我们的前 20 例患者和最后 20 例患者之间的比较中,前者的 EBL 更大(282 与 116ml,p=0.0005;8.5%与 3.6%,p=0.0024)、手术时间更长(4.8 小时与 3.3 小时,p<0.001)、麻醉时间更长(7.4 小时与 5.7 小时,p=0.0001)、住院时间更长(3.7 天与 3.2 天,p=0.019)。我们还发现,在 2019 年之后接受 VBT 手术的患者,EBL、手术时间、麻醉时间和 LOS 也显著减少。在 5 年的研究期间或在不同的队列之间,主 Cobb 角的矫正百分比或 90 天并发症没有显著变化。
本系列研究表明,VBT 的手术效率有所提高,包括在 5 年内术中出血量、手术时间、麻醉时间和住院时间减少。这表明手术技术有所提高,并概述了希望进行该手术的外科医生的陡峭学习曲线。改进的外科医生培训计划和新的仪器可能会减少这一学习曲线。
67 例患者在 5 年内,在单一中心进行的 VBT 手术的术中出血量、麻醉时间、手术时间和住院时间均显著减少,表明存在陡峭的学习曲线。