Comparing efficacy and safety of mirabegron, tamsulosin, and solifenacin in ureteral stent-related symptoms: outcomes from a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Although ureteral stents are a well-established and commonly used method for renal drainage, the ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs) they cause in patients cannot be ignored. It is currently unclear whether mirabegron has a place in the treatment of SRSs. Our study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in treating SRSs in adult patients.

METHODS

Through a systematical search of multiple scientific databases before August 2023, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA. Analysis was performed under multivariate random-effects network models and effects of drugs was ranked with surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) probabilities.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 2,002 patients were included. All regimens (including mirabegron, solifenacin, and tamsulosin) were significantly better than placebo in urinary symptoms. Solifenacin was associated with more adverse drug events than mirabegron and tamsulosin. The SUCRA values showed that mirabegron was the best in the outcomes of body pain (71.5%), sexual matters (76.4%), and adverse events (70.5%). Solifenacin was the best in the outcomes of urinary symptoms (73.1%), general health (81.0%), and work performance (85.1%). Tamsulosin had the lowest rate of all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional drugs for relieving SRSs, mirabegron performs best in terms of alleviating body pain, sexual matters, and adverse events, with little difference in urinary symptoms and general health. Further high-quality prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to provide sufficient evidence supporting our observations.