Department of Medical and Translational Biology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Sep;80(9):1363-1371. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03707-4. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
To assess a systematic implementation approach for introducing dapagliflozin to individuals with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in an outpatient clinical setting.
Retrospective medical record data were analysed. All individuals diagnosed with heart failure who resided within the hospital catchment area and had visited cardiology or internal medicine department between 2010 and 2019 were screened by using the main inclusion criteria from the DAPA-HF trial. The effectiveness of the previously described seven-step systematic implementation approach was assessed by the proportion receiving information letter, dapagliflozin treatment, follow-ups at 2-12 weeks and 12 months post-dapagliflozin initiation, persistence on dapagliflozin, adverse events, and reasons for discontinuation.
Of the 2433 individuals, 352 met the main DAPA-HF trial criteria in step 2. After exclusions in steps 3 and 4, 191 individuals remained. Of these, 158 were invited for eligibility discussion in step 5, with 107 having received an information letter beforehand. In step 6, dapagliflozin was prescribed to 69 individuals, and in step 7, follow-ups were conducted with 56 individuals at 2-12 weeks and 62 individuals at 12 months. Sixty out of 69 persisted on dapagliflozin after 12 months. Adverse events were reported by nine individuals. Discontinuation was attributed to reasons such as urinary tract infections, genital or abdominal discomfort, and hypotension.
The systematic introduction of dapagliflozin to heart failure patients was effective. Despite this, challenges in uniformly implementing procedures across patients were evident, emphasizing the necessity for a systematic implementation approach.
评估一种在门诊临床环境中向射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者引入达格列净的系统实施方法。
回顾性分析病历数据。通过使用 DAPA-HF 试验的主要纳入标准,筛选出 2010 年至 2019 年间居住在医院服务区内并曾在心脏病学或内科就诊的所有心力衰竭诊断患者。通过接受信息信、达格列净治疗、达格列净起始后 2-12 周和 12 个月的随访、达格列净持续治疗、不良事件和停药原因,评估先前描述的七步系统实施方法的有效性。
在 2433 名患者中,有 352 名符合第 2 步 DAPA-HF 试验的主要标准。在第 3 步和第 4 步排除后,仍有 191 名患者。其中,有 158 名在第 5 步被邀请参加资格讨论,其中 107 名患者事先收到了信息信。在第 6 步中,有 69 名患者开具了达格列净处方,在第 7 步中,有 56 名患者在 2-12 周和 62 名患者在 12 个月进行了随访。在 12 个月后,有 60 名患者持续使用达格列净。有 9 名患者报告了不良事件。停药的原因包括尿路感染、生殖器或腹部不适和低血压等。
向心力衰竭患者系统引入达格列净是有效的。尽管如此,在将程序统一应用于所有患者方面仍存在挑战,这强调了需要采用系统的实施方法。