Suppr超能文献

局部浸润麻醉与超声引导下胸肌(PEC1)+前锯肌平面(SAP)阻滞对行原发性胸肌下隆乳术患者术后麻醉后护理单元疼痛控制的影响。

Local Infiltration Anesthesia Versus Ultrasound-Guided Pectoralis (PEC1) + Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) Blocks on Postanesthetic Care Unit Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Primary Submuscular Augmentation Mammoplasty.

机构信息

From the Tulane University School of Medicine.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, Metairie, LA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 1;92(6S Suppl 4):S397-S400. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003948.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided regional field blocks are not widely used in outpatient plastic surgeries. The efficacy of truncal blocks (PEC1 + SAP) has not been established in plastic surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of these newer anesthetic techniques compared with traditional blind local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing breast augmentation.

METHODS

This retrospective institutional review board-approved cohort study compared the outcomes of the different practices of 2 plastic surgeons at the same accredited outpatient surgery center between 2018 and 2022. Group 1 received an intraoperative blind local infiltration anesthetic. Group 2 underwent surgeon-led, intraoperative, ultrasound-guided PEC1 (Pectoralis 1) + SAP (serratus anterior plane) blocks. Patients who underwent any procedure other than primary submuscular augmentation mammoplasty were excluded from the study. The outcomes measured included operative time, opioid utilization in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), pain level at discharge, and time spent in the post anesthetic care unit (PACU).

RESULTS

Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria for each group for a total of 120 patients. The study groups were similar to each other. Patients receiving PEC1 + SAP blocks (group 2) had significantly lower average MME requirements in the PACU (3.04 MME vs 4.52 MME, P = 0.041) and required a shorter average PACU stay (70.13 minutes vs 80.38 minutes, P = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the pain level at discharge, operative time, or implant size between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon-led, intraoperative, ultrasound-guided PEC1 + SAP blocks significantly decreased opioid utilization in the PACU by 33% and patient time in the PACU by 13%, while achieving similar patient pain scores and operating times.

摘要

背景

在门诊整形外科中,超声引导的区域阻滞技术并未广泛应用。在整形外科中,躯干阻滞(PEC1 + SAP)的疗效尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是分析这些较新的麻醉技术与传统盲法局部麻醉浸润在接受乳房隆乳术患者中的效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性机构审查委员会批准的队列研究,比较了 2018 年至 2022 年期间同一家认证门诊手术中心的 2 位整形外科医生的不同实践结果。第 1 组接受术中盲法局部浸润麻醉。第 2 组接受术者主导、术中超声引导的 PEC1(胸大肌 1 区)+SAP(前锯肌平面)阻滞。研究排除了除原发性胸肌下隆乳术以外的任何手术患者。测量的结果包括手术时间、吗啡等效剂量(MME)的阿片类药物使用量、出院时的疼痛程度和在麻醉后监护病房(PACU)停留的时间。

结果

每组有 60 例患者符合纳入标准,总共有 120 例患者。研究组之间相似。接受 PEC1 + SAP 阻滞的患者(第 2 组)在 PACU 中的平均 MME 需求明显较低(3.04 MME 比 4.52 MME,P = 0.041),并且在 PACU 中停留的平均时间较短(70.13 分钟比 80.38 分钟,P = 0.008)。两组患者在出院时的疼痛程度、手术时间或植入物大小方面无显著差异。

结论

术者主导、术中超声引导的 PEC1 + SAP 阻滞可使 PACU 中的阿片类药物使用率降低 33%,患者在 PACU 中的停留时间缩短 13%,同时达到类似的患者疼痛评分和手术时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验