• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基督教人类学对用于照顾老年人的社会辅助机器人伦理的贡献。

Christian anthropology-based contributions to the ethics of socially assistive robots in care for older adults.

作者信息

Gastmans Chris, Sinibaldi Edoardo, Lerner Richard, Yáñez Miguel, Kovács László, Palazzani Laura, Pegoraro Renzo, Vandemeulebroucke Tijs

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Centre for Convergent Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2024 Nov;38(9):787-795. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13322. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13322
PMID:38857488
Abstract

Our society, in general, and health care, in particular, faces notable challenges due to the emergence of innovative digital technologies. The use of socially assistive robots in aged care is a particular digital application that provokes ethical reflection. The answers we give to the ethical questions associated with socially assistive robots are framed by ontological and anthropological considerations of what constitutes human beings and how the meaning of being human relates to how these robots are conceived. Religious beliefs and secular worldviews, each of which may participate fully in pluralist societies, have an important responsibility in this foundational debate, as anthropological theories can be inspired by religious and secular viewpoints. This article identifies seven anthropological considerations grounded in the synthesis of biblical scriptures, Roman Catholic documents, and recent research literature. We highlight the inspirational quality of these anthropological considerations when dealing with ethical issues regarding the development and use of socially assistive robots in aged care. With this contribution, we aim to foster a global and inclusive dialogue on digitalization in aged care that deeply challenges our basic understanding of what constitutes a human being and how this notion relates to machine artefacts.

摘要

总体而言,我们的社会,尤其是医疗保健领域,正面临着因创新数字技术的出现而带来的显著挑战。在老年护理中使用社交辅助机器人是一种特别的数字应用,它引发了伦理思考。我们对与社交辅助机器人相关的伦理问题给出的答案,是由关于人类构成以及人类存在的意义如何与这些机器人的构想方式相关联的本体论和人类学考量所构建的。宗教信仰和世俗世界观,每一种都可以在多元社会中充分参与,在这场基础性辩论中负有重要责任,因为人类学理论可以受到宗教和世俗观点的启发。本文确定了基于圣经经文、罗马天主教文件和近期研究文献综合而成的七点人类学考量。我们强调在处理老年护理中社交辅助机器人的开发和使用所涉及的伦理问题时,这些人类学考量的启发性特质。通过这一贡献,我们旨在促进一场关于老年护理数字化的全球包容性对话,这场对话将深刻挑战我们对人类构成以及这一概念与机器制品如何相关的基本理解。

相似文献

1
Christian anthropology-based contributions to the ethics of socially assistive robots in care for older adults.基于基督教人类学对用于照顾老年人的社会辅助机器人伦理的贡献。
Bioethics. 2024 Nov;38(9):787-795. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13322. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
2
Ethical challenges in the use of social service robots for elderly people.将社会服务机器人用于老年人的伦理挑战。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jun;49(4):303-7. doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1066-5. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
The Ethics of Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care. A Focus Group Study With Older Adults in Flanders, Belgium.《社会辅助机器人在老年护理中的伦理问题》。一项针对比利时佛兰德地区老年人的焦点小组研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Oct 16;75(9):1996-2007. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz070.
4
Ethics of socially assistive robots in aged-care settings: a socio-historical contextualisation.老龄化护理环境中的社交辅助机器人的伦理:一种社会历史背景下的思考。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Feb;46(2):128-136. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105615. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍社交辅助人形机器人在医疗和社会保健领域应用的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096.
6
Exploring the impact of socially assistive robots on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.探讨社交辅助机器人在整个生命周期中对健康和幸福的影响:伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104730. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
7
Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia.居家认知辅助机器人:提高认知功能,使无痴呆的老年成年人保持独立。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Jul 13;15:1129-1139. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253236. eCollection 2020.
8
Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders.智能辅助技术使用的伦理问题:来自专业利益相关者定性研究的发现。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z.
9
Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) in In-Patient Care for the Elderly.社交辅助机器人在老年人住院护理中的应用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;260:178-185.
10
Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care: Ethical Orientations Beyond the Care-Romantic and Technology-Deterministic Gaze.社会辅助机器人在老年护理中的应用:超越关怀浪漫主义和技术决定论视角的伦理取向。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Mar 17;27(2):17. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00296-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics.欢迎宗教:宗教与全球生物伦理学的多元普遍主义方法。
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Jun;22(2):381-394. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10410-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
Ethical implications in using robots among older adults living with dementia.在患有痴呆症的老年人中使用机器人的伦理问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 25;15:1436273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436273. eCollection 2024.